Literature DB >> 12516646

Early loading of machined-surface Brånemark implants in completely edentulous mandibles: healed bone versus fresh extraction sites.

Hugo De Bruyn1, Bruno Collaert.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Restoration of edentulous mandibles with dental implants installed with a two-stage or one-stage surgical approach, yet with delayed loading, is a predictable and successful treatment.
PURPOSE: The present prospective study evaluated the success up to 3 years of function of nonroughened machined-surface Brånemark System implants (Nobel Biocare AB, Gothenburg, Sweden) loaded early or immediately with a fixed 12-unit bridge.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In total, 184 implants were installed in 36 patients: 30 with healed bone and 6 with some remaining teeth, which were extracted simultaneously with implant installation. The provisional or final prostheses were installed 0 to 52 (mean 18.2) days later.
RESULTS: Thirteen of 184 (7.1%) implants failed within 3 months of loading in 5 of 36 (13.9%) patients: 1 of 153 implants (0.7%) failed in healed bone, and 12 of 31 (39%) failed in fresh extraction sites. This consequently meant a loss of 3 of 36 (8.3%) prostheses, all in the extraction group. No implants were lost during 3 years of functional loading (16 patients, 75 implants). The average marginal bone level measured initially and after 1, 2, and 3 years was 0.8 mm (SD = 0.5), 1.0 mm (SD = 0.4), 1.1 mm (SD = 0.3), and 1.4 mm (SD = 0.5), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Four to six Brånemark implants with nonroughened machined titanium surfaces can be loaded early or immediately with cross-arch restorations in healed mandibulary bone, but this cannot be recommended for fresh extraction sites.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12516646     DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2002.tb00164.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res        ISSN: 1523-0899            Impact factor:   3.932


  4 in total

1.  Stress on external hexagon and Morse taper implants submitted to immediate loading.

Authors:  Caroline H Odo; Marcele J Pimentel; Rafael L X Consani; Marcelo F Mesquita; Mauro A A Nóbilo
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2015-07-29

Review 2.  One-time versus repeated abutment connection for platform-switched implant: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Qing-Qing Wang; Ruoxi Dai; Chris Ying Cao; Hui Fang; Min Han; Quan-Li Li
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Primary stability and PES/WES evaluation for immediate implants in the aesthetic zone: a pilot clinical double-blind randomized study.

Authors:  Arturo Sanchez-Perez; Ana I Nicolas-Silvente; Carmen Sanchez-Matas; Silvia Molina-García; Carlos Navarro-Cuellar; Georgios E Romanos
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-08       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 4.  Dental Implants Inserted in Fresh Extraction Sockets versus Healed Sites: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Adam Ibrahim; Bruno Ramos Chrcanovic
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 3.623

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.