BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: An Er:YAG laser effectively removes dental hard substance, and causes less pain during tooth preparations than high-speed drilling. This laser was introduced to eliminate the noise, vibration, pressure, and heat associated with the high-speed drilling. However, the difference in tooth vibration caused by the Er:YAG laser and the high-speed drill is unclear. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate tooth vibration obtained with the Er:YAG laser and high-speed drill. STUDY DESIGN/ MATERIALS AND METHODS: Each of the five extracted permanent upper first premolars were built up in a plaster box. In this study, a silicone impression material was selected to simulate periodontal tissue. The vibration speed was measured by using a laser Doppler vibrometer. RESULTS: The Er:YAG laser irradiation energy was 50, 100, 145, 199, 300, and 350 mJ. As irradiation energy increased, vibration of the tooth also rose; a high-correlation coefficient was observed between them. We found that only a small amount of the tooth vibration occurred with the Er:YAG laser preparations. The mean vibration speed and standard deviation with the laser were 166 +/- 28 microm/second when the output energy was 145 mJ, whereas those with the high-speed drill were 65 +/- 48 mm/second. The frequency characteristic approached 230 Hz and 5 kHz, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: These results show that the high-speed drilling causes greater tooth vibration and has a frequency spectrum near the high sensitivity of hearing compared to the Er:YAG laser. This suggests a potential factor in provoking pain and displeasure during tooth preparation. Future study to examine the relationship of pain and amount of tooth vibration will be planned. Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: An Er:YAG laser effectively removes dental hard substance, and causes less pain during tooth preparations than high-speed drilling. This laser was introduced to eliminate the noise, vibration, pressure, and heat associated with the high-speed drilling. However, the difference in tooth vibration caused by the Er:YAG laser and the high-speed drill is unclear. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate tooth vibration obtained with the Er:YAG laser and high-speed drill. STUDY DESIGN/ MATERIALS AND METHODS: Each of the five extracted permanent upper first premolars were built up in a plaster box. In this study, a silicone impression material was selected to simulate periodontal tissue. The vibration speed was measured by using a laser Doppler vibrometer. RESULTS: The Er:YAG laser irradiation energy was 50, 100, 145, 199, 300, and 350 mJ. As irradiation energy increased, vibration of the tooth also rose; a high-correlation coefficient was observed between them. We found that only a small amount of the tooth vibration occurred with the Er:YAG laser preparations. The mean vibration speed and standard deviation with the laser were 166 +/- 28 microm/second when the output energy was 145 mJ, whereas those with the high-speed drill were 65 +/- 48 mm/second. The frequency characteristic approached 230 Hz and 5 kHz, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: These results show that the high-speed drilling causes greater tooth vibration and has a frequency spectrum near the high sensitivity of hearing compared to the Er:YAG laser. This suggests a potential factor in provoking pain and displeasure during tooth preparation. Future study to examine the relationship of pain and amount of tooth vibration will be planned. Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Authors: Walter Raucci-Neto; Carla Raquel Dos Santos; Fabrício Augusto de Lima; Jesus Djalma Pécora; Luciano Bachmann; Regina Guenka Palma-Dibb Journal: Lasers Med Sci Date: 2014-04-23 Impact factor: 3.161