Literature DB >> 24114067

Use of a microsecond Er:YAG laser in laryngeal surgery reduces collateral thermal injury in comparison to superpulsed CO2 laser.

Arne Böttcher1, Nathan Jowett, Stanislav Kucher, Rudolph Reimer, Udo Schumacher, Rainald Knecht, Wolfgang Wöllmer, Adrian Münscher, Carsten V Dalchow.   

Abstract

Despite causing significant thermocoagulative insult, use of the carbon dioxide (CO2) laser is considered gold standard in surgery for early stage larynx carcinoma. Limited attention has been paid to the use of the erbium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet (Er:YAG) laser in laryngeal surgery as a means to reduce thermal tissue injury. The objective of this study is to compare the extent of thermal injury and precision of vocal fold incisions made using microsecond Er:YAG and superpulsed CO2 lasers. In the optics laboratory ex vivo porcine vocal folds were incised using Er:YAG and CO2 lasers. Lateral epithelial and subepithelial thermal damage zones and cutting gap widths were histologically determined. Environmental scanning electron microscopy (ESEM) images were examined for signs of carbonization. Temperature rise during Er:YAG laser incisions was determined using infrared thermography (IRT). In comparison to the CO2 laser, Er:YAG laser incisions showed significantly decreased epithelial (236.44 μm) and subepithelial (72.91 μm) damage zones (p < 0.001). Cutting gaps were significantly narrower for CO2 (878.72 μm) compared to Er:YAG (1090.78 μm; p = 0.027) laser. ESEM revealed intact collagen fibres along Er:YAG laser cutting edges without obvious carbonization, in comparison to diffuse carbonization and tissue melting seen for CO2 laser incisions. IRT demonstrated absolute temperature rise below 70 °C for Er:YAG laser incisions. This study has demonstrated significantly reduced lateral thermal damage zones with wider basal cutting gaps for vocal fold incisions made using Er:YAG laser in comparison to those made using CO2 laser.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24114067     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-013-2761-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  19 in total

1.  Laser physics and laser-tissue interaction.

Authors:  A J Welch; J H Torres; W F Cheong
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  1989

2.  Chemical and structural changes in blood undergoing laser photocoagulation.

Authors:  John F Black; Jennifer Kehlet Barton
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.421

Review 3.  Principles of lasers and biophotonic effects.

Authors:  Verena Knappe; Frank Frank; Ewa Rohde
Journal:  Photomed Laser Surg       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.796

4.  Er:YAG laser cavity preparation and composite resin bonding with a single-component adhesive system: relationship between shear bond strength and microleakage.

Authors:  Marie-France Bertrand; Gianfranco Semez; Eric Leforestier; Michèle Muller-Bolla; Samir Nammour; Jean-Paul Rocca
Journal:  Lasers Surg Med       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.025

5.  History of lasers in medicine.

Authors:  D S Choy
Journal:  Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 1.827

6.  Laser surgery of the vocal cords. An experimental study with carbon dioxide lasers on dogs.

Authors:  G J Jako
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1972-12       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  What treatment for early-stage glottic carcinoma among adult patients: CO2 endolaryngeal laser excision versus standard fractionated external beam radiation is superior in terms of cost utility?

Authors:  Kevin M Higgins
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.325

8.  A novel tool in laryngeal surgery: preliminary results of the picosecond infrared laser.

Authors:  Arne Böttcher; Till S Clauditz; Rainald Knecht; Stanislav Kucher; Wolfgang Wöllmer; Waldemar Wilczak; Peter Krötz; Nathan Jowett; Carsten V Dalchow; Adrian Münscher; R J Dwayne Miller
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 3.325

9.  An in vitro comparison of the Erbium: YAG laser and the carbon dioxide laser in laryngeal surgery.

Authors:  R C Herdman; A Charlton; A E Hinton; A J Freemont
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 1.469

10.  The Efficacy and Safety of Ablative Fractional Resurfacing Using a 2,940-Nm Er:YAG Laser for Traumatic Scars in the Early Posttraumatic Period.

Authors:  Sun Goo Kim; Eun Yeon Kim; Yu Jin Kim; Se Il Lee
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2012-05-10
View more
  5 in total

1.  Tissue surface information for intraoperative incision planning and focus adjustment in laser surgery.

Authors:  Andreas Schoob; Dennis Kundrat; Lukas Kleingrothe; Lüder A Kahrs; Nicolas Andreff; Tobias Ortmaier
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2014-05-30       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  Comparative study on the incision healing of the palatal mucosa by using Er:YAG laser or traditional scalpel in the SD rats.

Authors:  Weidong Qu; Jiang Shang; Li Liu; Dapeng Xu; Pinggong Du; Zhonghao Liu
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 3.161

3.  Reduction of thermocoagulative injury via use of a picosecond infrared laser (PIRL) in laryngeal tissues.

Authors:  Arne Böttcher; Stanislav Kucher; Rainald Knecht; Nathan Jowett; Peter Krötz; Rudolph Reimer; Udo Schumacher; Sven Anders; Adrian Münscher; Carsten V Dalchow; R J Dwayne Miller
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-01-11       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Selected applications of Er:YAG and CO2 lasers for treatment of benign neoplasms and tumorous lesions in the mouth.

Authors:  Katarzyna Błochowiak; Piotr Andrysiak; Krzysztof Sidorowicz; Henryk Witmanowski; Wiesław Hędzelek; Jerzy Sokalski
Journal:  Postepy Dermatol Alergol       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 1.837

Review 5.  Use of erbium laser in the treatment of persistent post-radiotherapy laryngeal edema: a case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Aris I Giotakis; Claus Pototschnig
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-08-27       Impact factor: 2.754

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.