Literature DB >> 12515332

The Victorian emergency department collaboration.

Jenny Bartlett1, Peter Cameron, Maree Cisera.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the project was to bring together 17 major emergency departments across Victoria, Australia, and the Australian Capital Territory to work together over an 8-month period to reduce both clinical and operational waits and delays, and to improve patient satisfaction.
DESIGN: The collaborative was based on the Institute for Healthcare Improvement's Breakthrough Series, and utlilized their intellectual property and methodology adapted for the Australian setting.
SETTING: The largest (by annual attendances) 17 emergency departments in the State of Victoria and one hospital in the Australian Capital Territory participated. STUDY PARTICIPANTS: Each hospital sent a team of three to five persons, which included the Emergency Department Medical Director and Nurse in Charge, and an Executive Sponsor to each learning session.
INTERVENTIONS: The teams were required to attend four learning sessions, to participate during the action period in both clinical and operational improvement activities, and to report regularly in the form of data reports and conference calls. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Each team selected at least one or two clinical topics for improvement and at least one operational project to undertake during the life of the collaborative. A patient satisfaction survey was commenced towards the end of the project.
RESULTS: Forty-seven clinical projects were nominated during the life of the collaborative and 32 of these were completed, with 31 resulting in significant improvement or achieving target. Thirty-nine operational projects were nominated, 30 of which were completed, with 24 of these achieving improvement or target. Numerous additional achievements occurred, which evolved from the framework of supported collaboration.
CONCLUSION: The spread of knowledge and innovation can be best facilitated rapidly by teams working together using a structured program in a supported environment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12515332     DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/14.6.463

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care        ISSN: 1353-4505            Impact factor:   2.038


  5 in total

1.  Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of the collaborative method: reflections from a single site.

Authors:  P J Newton; E J Halcomb; P M Davidson; A R Denniss
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2007-12

Review 2.  What is the value and impact of quality and safety teams? A scoping review.

Authors:  Deborah E White; Sharon E Straus; H Tom Stelfox; Jayna M Holroyd-Leduc; Chaim M Bell; Karen Jackson; Jill M Norris; W Ward Flemons; Michael E Moffatt; Alan J Forster
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2011-08-23       Impact factor: 7.327

3.  Intellectual capital-based performance improvement: a study in healthcare sector.

Authors:  Simona Alfiero; Valerio Brescia; Fabrizio Bert
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 2.655

4.  A collaborative quality improvement model and electronic community of practice to support sepsis management in emergency departments: investigating care harmonization for provincial knowledge translation.

Authors:  Kendall Ho; Julian Marsden; Sandra Jarvis-Selinger; Helen Novak Lauscher; Noreen Kamal; Rob Stenstrom; David Sweet; Ran D Goldman; Grant Innes
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2012-07-12

5.  Enablers of the implementation of tissue plasminogen activator in acute stroke care: a cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Alice Grady; Jamie Bryant; Mariko Carey; Chris Paul; Rob Sanson-Fisher
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.