Literature DB >> 12513958

Routine operative breast endoscopy during lumpectomy.

William C Dooley1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Lumpectomy for the management of breast cancer is commonly directed by mammography or ultrasound. We hypothesized that fluid-producing ducts would likely connect to the site of the known cancerous or precancerous lesion and that endoscopic evaluation might reveal unsuspected additional disease.
METHODS: All women undergoing lumpectomy in a single surgeon's practice from January 2000 to August 2001 were evaluated for fluid production from the nipple at the time of lumpectomy. All fluid-producing ducts were cannulated and endoscoped with a 0.9-mm Acueity microendoscope.
RESULTS: Of the 201 patients (16 with atypical ductal hyperplasia, 52 with ductal carcinoma-in-situ, and 133 with stage 1 or 2 breast cancers), 150 (74.6%) could be successfully dilated and scoped. Additional lesions outside the anticipated lumpectomy were identified in 41% (n = 83) of cases. If successful, the chances for a positive margin for cancer decreased from 23.5% to only 5.0%. Endoscopy proved to be a useful adjunct in this series of patients because it identified all cases of extensive intraductal component in early-stage breast cancer.
CONCLUSIONS: Routine operative breast endoscopy can reduce the need for re-excision lumpectomy. It also finds substantially more cancerous and precancerous disease than anticipated by routine preoperative mammography and ultrasound.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12513958     DOI: 10.1245/aso.2003.03.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  9 in total

Review 1.  Comparison of ductoscopy, galactography, and imaging modalities for the evaluation of intraductal lesions: a critical review.

Authors:  Ozgur Sarica; Enis Ozturk; Huseyin C Demirkurek; Fatih Uluc
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  A comparison of ductoscopy-guided and conventional surgical excision in women with spontaneous nipple discharge.

Authors:  Robyn M Moncrief; Ritu Nayar; Leslie K Diaz; Valerie L Staradub; Monica Morrow; Seema A Khan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  The INTEND 1 randomized controlled trial of duct endoscopy as an indicator of margin excision in breast conservation surgery.

Authors:  Gerald Gui; Effrosyni Panopoulou; Sarah Tang; Dominique Twelves; Mohammed Kabir; Ann Ward; Catherine Montgomery; Ashutosh Nerurkar; Peter Osin; Clare M Isacke
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  Intraductal approach to breast cancer: the role of mammary ductoscopy.

Authors:  Vinay Deshmane
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-03-22

Review 5.  Mammary ductoscopy in the current management of breast disease.

Authors:  Sarah S K Tang; Dominique J Twelves; Clare M Isacke; Gerald P H Gui
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-12-18       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Subgross morphology, the sick lobe hypothesis, and the success of breast conservation.

Authors:  Tibor Tot
Journal:  Int J Breast Cancer       Date:  2011-05-05

7.  Redefining lumpectomy using a modification of the "sick lobe" hypothesis and ductal anatomy.

Authors:  W Dooley; J Bong; J Parker
Journal:  Int J Breast Cancer       Date:  2011-06-30

8.  Does mammary ductoscopy have a role in clinical practice?

Authors:  W Al Sarakbi; M Salhab; K Mokbel
Journal:  Int Semin Surg Oncol       Date:  2006-06-30

Review 9.  Ductal approaches to assessment and management of women at high risk for developing breast cancer.

Authors:  Imogen Locke; Gillian Mitchell; Rosalind Eeles
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2004-01-26       Impact factor: 6.466

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.