Literature DB >> 12509239

Structure-based interpretation of missense mutations in Y-family DNA polymerases and their implications for polymerase function and lesion bypass.

François Boudsocq1, Hong Ling, Wei Yang, Roger Woodgate.   

Abstract

Our understanding of the molecular mechanisms of error-prone lesion bypass has changed dramatically in the past few years. The concept that the key participants in the mutagenic process were accessory proteins that somehow modified the ability of the cell's main replicase to facilitate bypass of normally blocking lesions has been replaced with one in which the replicase is displaced by a polymerase specialized in lesion bypass. The participants in this process remain the same, only their function has been reassigned. What was once known as the UmuC/DinB/Rev1/Rad30 superfamily of mutagenesis proteins, is now known as the Y-family of DNA polymerases. Quite remarkably, within the space of 3 years, the field has advanced from the initial discovery of intrinsic polymerase function, to the determination of the tertiary structures of several Y-family DNA polymerases.A key to determining the biochemical properties of each DNA polymerase is through structure-function studies that result in the site-specific substitution of particular amino acids at critical sites within each DNA polymerase. However, we should not forget the power of genetic selection that allows us to identify residues within each polymerase that are generated by "random mutagenesis" and which are important for both a gain or loss of function in vivo. In this review, we discuss the structural ramifications of several missense mutations previously identified in various Y-family DNA polymerase and speculate on how each amino acid substitution might modify the enzymatic activity of the respective polymerase or possibly perturb protein-protein interactions necessary for efficient translesion replication in vivo.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12509239     DOI: 10.1016/s1568-7864(02)00019-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)        ISSN: 1568-7856


  32 in total

1.  The dinB operon and spontaneous mutation in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Gregory J McKenzie; Daniel B Magner; Peter L Lee; Susan M Rosenberg
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.490

2.  Structural basis for recruitment of translesion DNA polymerase Pol IV/DinB to the beta-clamp.

Authors:  Karen A Bunting; S Mark Roe; Laurence H Pearl
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2003-11-03       Impact factor: 11.598

3.  Multiple solutions to inefficient lesion bypass by T7 DNA polymerase.

Authors:  Scott D McCulloch; Thomas A Kunkel
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2006-07-28

Review 4.  Formation and repair of interstrand cross-links in DNA.

Authors:  David M Noll; Tracey McGregor Mason; Paul S Miller
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 60.622

5.  Increased Processivity, Misincorporation, and Nucleotide Incorporation Efficiency in Sulfolobus solfataricus Dpo4 Thumb Domain Mutants.

Authors:  Li Wang; Chenchen Liang; Jing Wu; Liming Liu; Keith E J Tyo
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 6.  Better living with hyper-mutation.

Authors:  Myron F Goodman
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 3.216

7.  Biochemical analysis of active site mutations of human polymerase η.

Authors:  Samuel C Suarez; Renee A Beardslee; Shannon M Toffton; Scott D McCulloch
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 2.433

8.  Amino acid architecture that influences dNTP insertion efficiency in Y-family DNA polymerase V of E. coli.

Authors:  Kwang Young Seo; Jun Yin; Prashant Donthamsetti; Sushil Chandani; Chui Hong Lee; Edward L Loechler
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  Antibiotic resistance acquired through a DNA damage-inducible response in Acinetobacter baumannii.

Authors:  Matthew D Norton; Allison J Spilkia; Veronica G Godoy
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2013-01-11       Impact factor: 3.490

10.  Genomic analysis of cancer tissue reveals that somatic mutations commonly occur in a specific motif.

Authors:  Nick M Makridakis; Lúcio Fábio Caldas Ferraz; Juergen K V Reichardt
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.878

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.