Literature DB >> 12508189

Coronary angiography in the fully anticoagulated patient: the transradial route is successful and safe.

David J R Hildick-Smith1, John T Walsh, Martin D Lowe, Michael C Petch.   

Abstract

The radial approach to coronary angiography is intuitively attractive for fully anticoagulated patients (INR > 2) but no data exist concerning efficacy or safety of this procedure. The consensus view is that the femoral approach is contraindicated in fully anticoagulated patients, and though some operators undertake femoral catheterization in such patients and use closure devices, there are no data to suggest that it is safe to do so. At our institution, the radial approach for coronary angiography is reserved for patients in whom there is a relative contraindication to the femoral route. We have undertaken over 600 radial coronary angiograms in such patients since 1996, 66 of whom underwent transradial catheterization specifically because of anticoagulation status (INR > 2). Thirty-eight patients (58%) were male, average age 67 +/- 11 years. All 66 patients had an INR > 2 but < 4.5. The approach was left radial in 26 (39%), right radial in the remainder; sheath size was 4 Fr in 4 (6%), 5 Fr in 13 (20%), and 6 Fr in 49 (74%). Seven operators in total were involved, though two operators undertook the majority of cases (47; 71%). Success rate was 97%, with no failure of access, and only one minor postprocedural hemorrhage. Failures were due to radial artery atherosclerosis (1) and subclavian tortuosity (1). The radial approach to coronary angiography is safe and to be recommended in the fully anticoagulated patient. Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12508189     DOI: 10.1002/ccd.10374

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1522-1946            Impact factor:   2.692


  6 in total

1.  Transradial rescue angioplasty for failed thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction: reperfusion with reduced vascular risk.

Authors:  T S N Lo; I R Hall; R Jaumdally; P M Davison; K Dickinson; D J Hildick-Smith; J Nolan
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 2.  Transcarpal cardiac catheterization.

Authors:  Torsten Schwalm
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2009-10-16       Impact factor: 5.594

3.  Comparative study of the radial and femoral artery approaches for diagnostic coronary angiography.

Authors:  Mansour Sallam; Hafidh Al-Hadi; S Rathinasekar; Sunil Chandy
Journal:  Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J       Date:  2009-12-19

4.  Repeated transradial catheterization: feasibility, efficacy, and safety.

Authors:  Marinos A Charalambous; Savvas S Constantinides; Michael A Talias; Elpidoforos S Soteriades; Christos P Christou
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2014-12-01

5.  Radiation exposure and patient experience during percutaneous coronary intervention using radial and femoral artery access.

Authors:  Håkan Geijer; Jan Persliden
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-04-21       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Procedural sedation during transradial coronary angiography to prevent spasm.

Authors:  M A Astarcioglu; T Sen; C Kilit; H I Durmus; G Gozubuyuk; H Z Agus; M Kalcik; S Karakoyun; M Yesin; A Dogan; M Ozkan
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 1.443

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.