Literature DB >> 21509310

Comparative study of the radial and femoral artery approaches for diagnostic coronary angiography.

Mansour Sallam1, Hafidh Al-Hadi, S Rathinasekar, Sunil Chandy.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Femoral artery access is the standard approach for coronary procedures; however, the radial approach has gained sound recognition as an alternative to femoral access. We present our early experience with the transradial approach.
METHODS: A prospective, non-randomised study of 221 candidates for diagnostic coronary angiography was carried out at Sultan Qaboos University Hospital, Oman between December 2008 and April 2009. The patients had their procedure performed from radial or femoral access according to operator discretion and the results were compared. Femoral and radial groups included 116 and 105 patients respectively.
RESULTS: Radial access was associated with a significantly higher rate of procedural failure (17.1%) versus 0% in femoral group (p = 0.001). There were no local vascular complications in the radial group as opposed to 12.1% in the femoral group (p < 0.01). Hospital length of stay was significantly reduced in the radial group (4.06 versus 23.5 hours, p < 0.01). Total procedure time was longer in the radial group (23.7 ± 13.7 min versus 20.1 ± 7.4 min, p < 0.001), but radiation exposure was similar in both groups. There was a trend for a higher risk of major adverse cardiac events noticed in the femoral group; however, it did not reach statistical significance.
CONCLUSION: The transradial approach for coronary angiography is associated with significantly reduced local vascular complications and shorter hospital stays. The femoral approach is the standard access site for coronary angiography; however, interventional cardiologists should acquire experience in the radial approach as an alternative in specific situations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Coronary angiography; Crossover; Femoral; Hospital stay; Local vascular complications; Radial; bleeding

Year:  2009        PMID: 21509310      PMCID: PMC3074808     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J        ISSN: 2075-051X


  21 in total

1.  Transradial Coronary Stenting: A United States Experience.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Invasive Cardiol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 2.022

2.  ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary angiography: executive summary and recommendations. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Coronary Angiography) developed in collaboration with the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions.

Authors:  P J Scanlon; D P Faxon; A M Audet; B Carabello; G J Dehmer; K A Eagle; R D Legako; D F Leon; J A Murray; S E Nissen; C J Pepine; R M Watson; J L Ritchie; R J Gibbons; M D Cheitlin; T J Gardner; A Garson; R O Russell; T J Ryan; S C Smith
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1999-05-04       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Comparative study of the use of diltiazem as an antispasmodic drug in coronary angiography via the transradial approach.

Authors:  José Ronaldo Mont'Alverne Filho; João Alexandre Rezende Assad; Alexandre do Canto Zago; Ricardo Leite Vieira da Costa; Antonio Guarany Mont'Alverne Pierre; Mohamed Hassan Saleh; Rodrigo Barretto; Sérgio Luiz Navarro Braga; Fausto Feres; Amanda Guerra Moraes Rego Sousa; José Eduardo Moraes Rego Sousa
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2003-07-31       Impact factor: 2.000

4.  Should radial artery access be the "gold standard" for PCI?

Authors:  Martial Hamon; James Nolan
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2008-07-31       Impact factor: 5.994

5.  Transradial versus transfemoral approach for coronary angiography and intervention in patients above 75 years of age.

Authors:  Stephan Achenbach; Dieter Ropers; Lisa Kallert; Nesrin Turan; Robert Krähner; Tobias Wolf; Christoph Garlichs; Frank Flachskampf; Werner G Daniel; Josef Ludwig
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2008-11-01       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  A randomized comparison of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty by the radial, brachial and femoral approaches: the access study.

Authors:  F Kiemeneij; G J Laarman; D Odekerken; T Slagboom; R van der Wieken
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 7.  Entry sites for coronary angiography and therapeutic interventions: from the proximal to the distal radial artery.

Authors:  L Campeau
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 5.223

8.  Radial artery anomaly and its influence on transradial coronary procedural outcome.

Authors:  T S Lo; J Nolan; E Fountzopoulos; M Behan; R Butler; S L Hetherington; K Vijayalakshmi; R Rajagopal; D Fraser; A Zaman; D Hildick-Smith
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 5.994

9.  Learning curve in the use of the radial artery as vascular access in the performance of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty.

Authors:  S L Goldberg; R Renslo; R Sinow; W J French
Journal:  Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn       Date:  1998-06

10.  An unusual complication of transradial coronary angiography.

Authors:  Margaret B McEntegart; Jonathan R Dalzell; M Mitchell Lindsay
Journal:  J Invasive Cardiol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.022

View more
  3 in total

1.  Procedural and clinical utility of transulnar approach for coronary procedures following failure of radial route: Single centre experience.

Authors:  Mansour Sallam; Adil Al-Riyami; Mohammad Misbah; Rashid Al-Sukaiti; Abdallah Al-Alawi; Aiman Al-Wahaibi
Journal:  J Saudi Heart Assoc       Date:  2014-02-06

2.  The Higher Cross-over Rate from Transradial to Transfemoral Coronary Angiography: Do we have the explanation?

Authors:  Mansour Sallam; Hafidh Al-Hadi
Journal:  Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J       Date:  2010-07-19

3.  Comparison of radiation exposure and clinical outcomes between transradial and transfemoral diagnostic cerebral approaches: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Curtis Amankwah; Lauren Lombardo; John Rutledge; Ahsan Sattar; Bree Chancellor; Dorothea Altschul
Journal:  BMJ Surg Interv Health Technol       Date:  2022-01-21
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.