Literature DB >> 12507202

Surgical management of malignant colorectal polyps.

Santhat Nivatvongs1.   

Abstract

The anatomic landmarks of the depth of invasion for pedunculated lesions (Haggitt level) and the Sm system for the sessile lesions give excellent objective information in the management of malignant colorectal polyps. Malignant polyps with low risk of lymph node metastasis include pedunculated lesions with invasion into Haggitt levels 1, 2, and 3. Level 4 pedunculated lesions and sessile lesions in which the invasion is into Sm1 or Sm2 level also have low risk if there are no adverse factors. These lesions can be treated by a complete local excision. Lesions that have high risk of lymph node metastasis are those with invasion into the lower third of the submucosa (Sm3), lesions that contain lymphovascular invasion, and lesions sited in the lower third of the rectum. These lesions require an oncologic colorectal resection. For lesions in the distal third of the rectum, a per anal full-thickness excision followed by an adjuvant chemoradiation may be an alternative. The box below summarizes malignant colorectal polyps requiring oncologic bowel resections:

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12507202     DOI: 10.1016/s0039-6109(02)00043-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Clin North Am        ISSN: 0039-6109            Impact factor:   2.741


  10 in total

1.  Polyp morphology: an interobserver evaluation for the Paris classification among international experts.

Authors:  Sascha C van Doorn; Y Hazewinkel; James E East; Monique E van Leerdam; Amit Rastogi; Maria Pellisé; Silvia Sanduleanu-Dascalescu; Barbara A J Bastiaansen; Paul Fockens; Evelien Dekker
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 10.864

2.  Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery (TAMIS): a clinical spotlight review.

Authors:  Teresa deBeche-Adams; Imran Hassan; Stephen Haggerty; Dimitrios Stefanidis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Management of Rectal Polyps.

Authors:  Michelle L Cowan; Matthew L Silviera
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2016-12

Review 4.  Management of malignant colon polyps: current status and controversies.

Authors:  Cary B Aarons; Skandan Shanmugan; Joshua I S Bleier
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Transanal endoscopic microsurgery: long-term experience, indication expansion, and technical improvements.

Authors:  Daniel Léonard; Jean-François Colin; Christophe Remue; Jacques Jamart; Alex Kartheuser
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-09-05       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Management of the malignant polyp.

Authors:  Marcela Ramirez; Steven Schierling; Harry T Papaconstantinou; J Scott Thomas
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2008-11

7.  Piriformis muscle metastasis from a rectal polyp.

Authors:  Omer Salar; Helen Flockton; Rajeev Singh; Jonathan Reynolds
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2012-10-19

Review 8.  Pathological assessment of endoscopic resections of the gastrointestinal tract: a comprehensive clinicopathologic review.

Authors:  M Priyanthi Kumarasinghe; Michael J Bourke; Ian Brown; Peter V Draganov; Duncan McLeod; Catherine Streutker; Spiro Raftopoulos; Tetsuo Ushiku; Gregory Y Lauwers
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 7.842

Review 9.  Endoscopic Approach for Superficial Colorectal Neoplasms.

Authors:  Jun-Feng Xu; Lang Yang; Peng Jin; Jian-Qiu Sheng
Journal:  Gastrointest Tumors       Date:  2016-09-02

10.  Optical diagnosis of malignant colorectal polyps: is it feasible?

Authors:  Manon van der Vlugt; Sascha Corrie van Doorn; Junfeng Wang; Barbara Aj Bastiaansen; Lowewijk Aa Brosens; Paul Fockens; Evelien Dekker
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2016-05-19
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.