Literature DB >> 12505626

Evaluation of automated RT-PCR to accelerate the laboratory diagnosis of foot-and-mouth disease virus.

Scott M Reid1, Sylvia S Grierson, Nigel P Ferris, Geoffrey H Hutchings, Soren Alexandersen.   

Abstract

Automated fluorogenic (5' nuclease probe-based) reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) procedures were evaluated for the diagnosis of foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) using suspensions of vesicular epithelium, heparinised or clotted blood, milk and oesophageal-pharyngeal fluid ('probang') samples from the United Kingdom (UK) 2001 epidemic and on sera from animals experimentally infected with the outbreak serotype O FMD virus strain. A MagNA Pure LC was initially programmed to automate the nucleic acid extraction and RT procedures with the PCR amplification carried out manually by fluorogenic assay in a GeneAmp 5700 Sequence Detection System. This allowed 32 samples to be tested by one person in a typical working day or 64 samples by two people within 10-12 h. The PCR amplification was later automated and a protocol developed for one person to complete a single test incorporating 96 RT-PCR results within 2 working days or for two people to do the same thing in around 12 h. The RT-PCR results were directly compared with those obtained by the routine diagnostic tests of ELISA and virus isolation in cell culture. The results on blood, probang and milk samples were in broad agreement between the three procedures but specific RT-PCR protocols for such material have to be fully optimised as perhaps have the positive-negative acceptance criteria. However, the automated RT-PCR achieved definitive diagnostic results (positive or negative) on supernatant fluids from first passage inoculated cell cultures and its sensitivity was greater than ELISA on suspensions of vesicular epithelium (ES) and at least equivalent to that of virus isolation in cell culture. The combined tests of ELISA, virus isolation in cell culture and RT-PCR might, therefore, only be required for confirmation of a first outbreak of FMD in a previously FMD-free country. Should a prolonged outbreak subsequently occur, then either ELISA plus RT-PCR or else RT-PCR alone could be used as the laboratory diagnostic tool(s). Either approach would eliminate the requirement for sample passage in cell culture and considerably advance the issue of laboratory diagnostic test results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12505626     DOI: 10.1016/s0166-0934(02)00210-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Virol Methods        ISSN: 0166-0934            Impact factor:   2.014


  21 in total

Review 1.  Foot-and-mouth disease.

Authors:  Marvin J Grubman; Barry Baxt
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 26.132

2.  Robust Real-Time Reverse Transcription-PCR for Detection of Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus Neutralizing Carryover Contamination.

Authors:  Ji-Hyeon Hwang; Yong-Keol Shin; So-Yeon Park; Jeesoo Kim; Su-Mi Kim; Byounghan Kim; Jong-Hyeon Park; Jong-Soo Lee; Kwang-Nyeong Lee
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 3.  Options for control of foot-and-mouth disease: knowledge, capability and policy.

Authors:  David J Paton; Keith J Sumption; Bryan Charleston
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-09-27       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Detection of foot and mouth disease and porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome viral genes using microarray chip.

Authors:  Y-C Liu; G S Huang; M-C Wu; M-Y Hong; K-P Hsiung
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.459

5.  Use of confocal immunofluorescence microscopy to localize viral nonstructural proteins and potential sites of replication in pigs experimentally infected with foot-and-mouth disease virus.

Authors:  P Monaghan; J Simpson; C Murphy; S Durand; M Quan; S Alexandersen
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 5.103

6.  A simple and rapid colloidal gold-based immunochromatogarpic strip test for detection of FMDV serotype A.

Authors:  Tao Jiang; Zhong Liang; Wei-wei Ren; Juan Chen; Xiao-ying Zhi; Guang-yu Qi; Xiang-tao Liu; Xue-peng Cai
Journal:  Virol Sin       Date:  2011-02-18       Impact factor: 4.327

7.  Foot-and-mouth disease virus can induce a specific and rapid CD4+ T-cell-independent neutralizing and isotype class-switched antibody response in naïve cattle.

Authors:  Nicholas Juleff; Miriam Windsor; Eric A Lefevre; Simon Gubbins; Pip Hamblin; Elizabeth Reid; Kerry McLaughlin; Peter C L Beverley; Ivan W Morrison; Bryan Charleston
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2009-01-28       Impact factor: 5.103

8.  Seroprevalence and Molecular Detection of Foot and Mouth Disease Virus in Dairy Cattle Around Addis Ababa, Central Ethiopia.

Authors:  Shazali Mohammed Awel; Getachew Mulatu Dilba; Bruk Abraha; Demeke Zewde; Bayeta Senbata Wakjira; Abde Aliy
Journal:  Vet Med (Auckl)       Date:  2021-07-12

9.  Interferon-γ induced by in vitro re-stimulation of CD4+ T-cells correlates with in vivo FMD vaccine induced protection of cattle against disease and persistent infection.

Authors:  Yooni Oh; Lucy Fleming; Bob Statham; Pip Hamblin; Paul Barnett; David J Paton; Jong-Hyeon Park; Yi Seok Joo; Satya Parida
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Capsid coding sequences of foot-and-mouth disease viruses are determinants of pathogenicity in pigs.

Authors:  Louise Lohse; Terry Jackson; Anette Bøtner; Graham J Belsham
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 3.683

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.