Literature DB >> 12505468

Breath alcohol measurement variability associated with different instrumentation and protocols.

Rod G Gullberg1.   

Abstract

Breath alcohol measurement has variability resulting from instrumental, procedural and biological components. Reliable estimates of the standard deviation (S.D.) are necessary for calculating uncertainty in the form of confidence intervals. These estimates are concentration dependant and can be obtained from models derived from duplicate breath test data. Duplicate data from four state jurisdictions (Alabama using the Drager 7110, Minnesota using the Intoxilyzer 5000, Washington using the BAC Datamaster and Wisconsin using the Intoximeter EC/IR) were analyzed to derive predictive models for standard deviation as a function of concentration. All jurisdiction/instrument combinations yielded forensically acceptable variation while showing a general linear increase in standard deviation with concentration. This is consistent with a multiplicative error model. Jurisdictions using the same instruments but not performing duplicate analyses could also employ the straightforward models derived here to estimate standard deviations for their measurement results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12505468     DOI: 10.1016/s0379-0738(02)00375-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Forensic Sci Int        ISSN: 0379-0738            Impact factor:   2.395


  3 in total

1.  Continuous minimally-invasive alcohol monitoring using microneedle sensor arrays.

Authors:  A M Vinu Mohan; Joshua Ray Windmiller; Rupesh K Mishra; Joseph Wang
Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 10.618

2.  Preparation and Gas Sensing Properties of In2O3/Au Nanorods for Detection of Volatile Organic Compounds in Exhaled Breath.

Authors:  Ruiqing Xing; Lin Xu; Jian Song; Chunyang Zhou; Qingling Li; Dali Liu; Hong Wei Song
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Fuel-cell breathalyser use for field research on alcohol intoxication: an independent psychometric evaluation.

Authors:  Jacob G Sorbello; Grant J Devilly; Corey Allen; Lee R J Hughes; Kathleen Brown
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 2.984

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.