Literature DB >> 12505116

Outpatient case presentations in the conference room versus examination room: results from two randomized controlled trials.

Robert J Anderson1, Elizabeth Cyran, Lisa Schilling, Chen Tan Lin, Gail Albertson, Lindsay Ware, John F Steiner.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Ambulatory case presentations occur typically in conference rooms, and attending physicians often have little contact with patients. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of two different ambulatory case presentation formats that involve attending physicians more directly. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We conducted two randomized controlled trials in a community-based ambulatory internal medicine clinic. Participants comprised 393 adult patients, 40 house officers, and 14 attending physicians. In the first trial, patient encounters were assigned randomly to either exclusive house officer-attending physician conference room discussion or to house officer-attending physician conference room discussion plus attending physician-patient interaction. In the second trial, patient encounters were assigned randomly to either exclusive house officer-attending physician conference room discussion or to exclusive house officer-attending physician discussion in the examining room with the patient present. Patient satisfaction; attending physician contributions to teaching, diagnosis, and therapy; and house officer comfort and autonomy were assessed.
RESULTS: Patient visit satisfaction and house officer assessment of attending physician teaching, diagnosis, and therapy were similar in the control and intervention groups of both trials. Patients involved in examination room discussions thought they were more comfortable with the discussion (mean +/- SD, 4.3 +/- 0.9 vs. 3.4 +/- 0.9 on a one- to five-point Likert scale, P <0.001) and more often indicated a preference to listen to the discussion in the future than did the control group (86% [71/83] vs. 63% [52/83], P <0.001). Some house officers (11% [9/83]) but no attending physicians (0/83, P <0.001) were made uncomfortable by examination room presentations, and some house officers (11% [9/83]) thought that examination room presentations diminished their autonomy.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients perceive that ambulatory examination room presentations are beneficial, whereas some house officers perceive that examination room presentations are associated with discomfort and diminished autonomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12505116     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9343(02)01320-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med        ISSN: 0002-9343            Impact factor:   4.965


  6 in total

Review 1.  Changing habits of practice. Transforming internal medicine residency education in ambulatory settings.

Authors:  Judith L Bowen; Stephen M Salerno; John K Chamberlain; Elizabeth Eckstrom; Helen L Chen; Suzanne Brandenburg
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Brief report: Utilizing an audiotape for outpatient preceptor faculty development.

Authors:  Laura Rees Willett
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  What do attending physicians contribute in a house officer-based ambulatory continuity clinic?

Authors:  Elizabeth M Cyran; Gail Albertson; Lisa M Schilling; Chen-Tan Lin; Lindsay Ware; John F Steiner; Robert J Anderson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Outpatient Exam Room Presentations in Resident Continuity Clinics: a Qualitative Report.

Authors:  Rachel Vanderberg; Tanya Nikiforova; Megan Hamm; Carla Spagnoletti; Melissa McNeil
Journal:  Med Sci Educ       Date:  2020-10-14

5.  A real-time locating system observes physician time-motion patterns during walk-rounds: a pilot study.

Authors:  David R Ward; William A Ghali; Alecia Graham; Jane B Lemaire
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 2.463

6.  Bedside or not bedside: Evaluation of patient satisfaction in intensive medical rehabilitation wards.

Authors:  Christophe Luthy; Patricia Francis Gerstel; Angela Pugliesi; Valérie Piguet; Anne-Françoise Allaz; Christine Cedraschi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.