Literature DB >> 34457812

Outpatient Exam Room Presentations in Resident Continuity Clinics: a Qualitative Report.

Rachel Vanderberg1, Tanya Nikiforova1, Megan Hamm1,2, Carla Spagnoletti1, Melissa McNeil1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Outpatient exam room presentations (OERPs) in resident continuity clinics could address several current challenges in graduate medical education including increasing patient satisfaction, enhancing patient-centered care, and operationalizing competency-based education through direct observation. The authors' aim of this study was to explore the positive and negative aspects of OERPs as a precepting model in resident continuity clinics and to develop a list of best practices for medical educators to utilize when conducting OERPs.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors defined an OERP as a case presentation and subsequent discussion taking place inside the exam room with the attending physician, resident physician, and patient present. Following a 1-month pilot period of conducting OERPs in internal medicine resident continuity clinics, the authors conducted individual phone interviews and focus groups with internal medicine attendings and residents, respectively. The authors analyzed transcripts using thematic analysis and the constant comparative method. Sixteen attendings participated in individual phone interviews and four resident focus groups averaged five participants per group.
RESULTS: Four main topics emerged: (1) effect of OERPs on patient care, (2) effect of OERPs on medical education, (3) barriers to OERPs, and (4) OERP best practices.
CONCLUSION: Participants noted both positive and negative effects of OERPs on patient care and medical education. Best practices suggested to maximize these benefits and minimize drawbacks included targeting OERPs to certain types of clinical encounters and employing strategies to preserve the resident physician-patient relationship and resident autonomy. © International Association of Medical Science Educators 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bedside rounds; Exam room presentation; Resident continuity clinics

Year:  2020        PMID: 34457812      PMCID: PMC8368740          DOI: 10.1007/s40670-020-01092-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Educ        ISSN: 2156-8650


  30 in total

Review 1.  Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis.

Authors:  M Q Patton
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Bedside Rounds Valued But Not Preferred: Perceptions of Internal Medicine Residents and Attending Physicians in a Diverse Academic Training Program.

Authors:  Naseema B Merchant; Daniel G Federman
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 0.954

3.  Whither bedside teaching? A focus-group study of clinical teachers.

Authors:  Subha Ramani; Jay D Orlander; Lee Strunin; Thomas W Barber
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 6.893

4.  Improving bedside teaching: findings from a focus group study of learners.

Authors:  Keith N Williams; Subha Ramani; Bruce Fraser; Jay D Orlander
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 6.893

5.  The physiologic and psychological effects of the bedside presentation.

Authors:  R J Simons; R G Baily; R Zelis; C W Zwillich
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1989-11-02       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  On bedside teaching.

Authors:  M A LaCombe
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1997-02-01       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Examination room presentations in general internal medicine clinic: patients' and students' perceptions.

Authors:  Heather D Rogers; Jan D Carline; Douglas S Paauw
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 6.893

8.  A randomized controlled study comparing educational outcomes of examination room versus conference room staffing.

Authors:  Kara Petersen; Marcy E Rosenbaum; Clarence D Kreiter; Alexandra Thomas; Scott A Vogelgesang; George V Lawry
Journal:  Teach Learn Med       Date:  2008 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.414

9.  Attending rounds in the current era: what is and is not happening.

Authors:  Chad Stickrath; Melissa Noble; Allan Prochazka; Mel Anderson; Megan Griffiths; Jonathan Manheim; Stefan Sillau; Eva Aagaard
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 21.873

10.  A piece of my mind. The road back to the bedside.

Authors:  Andrew Elder; Jeff Chi; Errol Ozdalga; John Kugler; Abraham Verghese
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 56.272

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.