Literature DB >> 12500879

Stability of implants and natural teeth as determined by the Periotest over 60 months of function.

S Winkler1, H F Morris, J R Spray.   

Abstract

Various methods for evaluating tooth mobility have been developed throughout the years, but their acceptance has been limited because of the subjectivity associated with their use. In recent years, the Periotest has been studied and used to evaluate the mobility of natural teeth and is claimed to b e potentially reliable in assessing the stability of the implant-bone interface. Few clinical implant studies have used natural teeth as controls to monitor changes in mobility associated with dental implants. The Dental Implant Clinical Research Group initiated a long-term clinical study in 1991 to assess the influence of design, application, and site of placement on clinical success and crestal bone height. As part of the study, Periotest values (PTVs) were recorded for 2,623 of the 2,998 implants placed and uncovered. For the statistical analysis, 2,623 implants were tested at second-stage surgery, with the number of implants tested varying at each follow-up visit. Data were collected from investigators at 32 study centers for periods ranging up to 60 months. A total of 975 natural teeth from 409 partially edentulous study subjects served as controls. FPVs on natural teeth and implants were combined, and the overall average Periotest values (OA-PTVs) were compared with values for individual subjects. The effect of implant and natural tooth locations on mobility were evaluated and compared with each other. The combined OA-PTV for all natural teeth was +1.8 and the OA-PTV for all implants was -3.4 PTVs. Compared with those in the maxillae, mandibular teeth and implants were found to be more stable Implants were found to be significantly more stable as compared with natural teeth. The recorded variations in PTVs for natural teeth and implants over the entire evaluation period were not found to be significantly different. This study developed the following conclusions: (1) implants were found to be significantly less mobile as compared with natural teeth for individual subjects; (2) the PTVs for natural teeth and implants did not exhibit significant variation over the evaluation period; (3) the Periotest can provide reproducible assessment of stability in a long-term clinical study; and (4) changes in PTVs may be helpful in evaluating improvement or degradation of the implant-bone complex.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 12500879     DOI: 10.1563/1548-1336(2001)027<0198:SOIANT>2.3.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Implantol        ISSN: 0160-6972            Impact factor:   1.779


  7 in total

1.  Quantitative percussion diagnostics and bone density analysis of the implant-bone interface in a pre- and postmortem human subject.

Authors:  Cherilyn G Sheets; Dee Dee Hui; Vaibhav Bajaj; James C Earthman
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.804

2.  Accuracy of CBCT images in the assessment of buccal marginal alveolar peri-implant defects: effect of field of view.

Authors:  K Kamburoğlu; S Murat; C Kılıç; S Yüksel; H Avsever; A Farman; W C Scarfe
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  Masticatory rehabilitation following upper and lower jaw reconstruction using vascularised free fibula flap and enossal implants-19 years of experience with a comprehensive concept.

Authors:  Samer George Hakim; Harald Kimmerle; Thomas Trenkle; Peter Sieg; Hans-Christian Jacobsen
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Vertical Bone Implant Contact Around Anterior Immediate Implants and Their Stability After Using Either Alloplast or L-PRF or Both in Peri-Implant Gap: A Prospective Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Md Shahbaz Alam; Arjun Dhiman; Veena Jain; Ongkila Bhutia; Gunjan Pruthi
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2020-07-28

5.  Evaluation of Qualitative Changes in Simulated Periodontal Ligament and Alveolar Bone Using a Noncontact Electromagnetic Vibration Device with a Laser Displacement Sensor.

Authors:  Hiroshi Kobayashi; Makoto Hayashi; Masaru Yamaoka; Takuya Yasukawa; Haruna Ibi; Bunnai Ogiso
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  Efficacy of Periapical Radiography and Three Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Systems for Detection of Peri-Implant Dehiscence Defects: An in- Vitro Study.

Authors:  Akheshteh V; Eskandarloo A; Saati S; Jamalpour M R; Mohammad Gholi Mezerji N
Journal:  J Biomed Phys Eng       Date:  2020-12-01

7.  Evaluation of the Clinical Success of Immediate Loading Implant in the Aesthetic Zone: An In Vivo Study.

Authors:  Mohammad Jalaluddin; Sandeep Subhash Arora; Thomas Varghese; Achuthan Nair; Faisal M A Gaffoor; Deesha Kumari
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2022-07-13
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.