Literature DB >> 12499716

Early outcome of carotid angioplasty and stenting versus carotid endarterectomy in a single academic center.

Andreas Kastrup1, Martin Skalej, Hilmar Krapf, Thomas Nägele, Johannes Dichgans, Jörg B Schulz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Evidence is accumulating that carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS) might become an alternative to carotid endarterectomy (CEA) for the treatment of high-grade carotid artery disease (CAD). Evaluating the efficacy of this novel technique in single institutions in addition to performing further large trials can help to guide optimal patient management in everyday practice.
METHODS: In this study we compared the early outcome of 100 prospectively followed patients who underwent CAS with a retrospectively reviewed group of 142 patients that underwent CEA over the same time period. Only patients who had received pre- and postsurgical evaluations by a neurologist were included. According to the criteria set forth by the large trials the occurrence of minor or major strokes, myocardial infarction and death within 30 days was analysed.
RESULTS: Both groups had similar age and sex distributions, as well as cerebrovascular risk factors. In the group of CAS patients 63 (63%) and in the group of CEA patients 92 (65%) had a symptomatic carotid stenosis, respectively. For symptomatic patients the overall complication rate (any stroke or death) was 6.5% (3 minor and 3 major strokes) in the surgical and 8% (2 minor strokes, 2 major strokes, and 1 death) in the non-surgical group (n.s.). For asymptomatic patients there was one minor stroke (2%) in the surgical and no stroke or death in the non-surgical group. As a frequent non-neurological complication the post-procedural course was complicated by groin hematoma requiring surgery in 3 CAS patients, and neck hematoma requiring additional surgery in 3 CEA patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Within our academic institution we found comparable complication rates for CAS and CEA in patients with symptomatic or asymptomatic high-grade CAD. Although these early results are promising and support the notion that CAS may become an alternative treatment option for CAD in everyday practice, the long-term efficacy of CAS has to be evaluated critically by means of further prospective studies. Copyright 2003 S. Karger AG, Basel

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12499716     DOI: 10.1159/000067134

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cerebrovasc Dis        ISSN: 1015-9770            Impact factor:   2.762


  5 in total

Review 1.  Acute and prophylactic endovascular treatment of internal carotid artery stenosis.

Authors:  Oliver Wittkugel
Journal:  Klin Neuroradiol       Date:  2009-05-15

Review 2.  Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Carotid Artery Stenting Versus Endarterectomy for Carotid Stenosis: A Chronological and Worldwide Study.

Authors:  Lei Zhang; Zhiqing Zhao; Yaoming Ouyang; Junmin Bao; Qingsheng Lu; Rui Feng; Jian Zhou; Zaiping Jing
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.889

3.  Clinical Analysis Comparing Efficacy between a Distal Filter Protection Device and Proximal Balloon Occlusion Device during Carotid Artery Stenting.

Authors:  Jong Hyeok Lee; Hee Eon Sohn; Seung Young Chung; Moon Sun Park; Seong Min Kim; Do Sung Lee
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2015-10-30

4.  Protected versus Unprotected Carotid Artery Stenting : Meta-Analysis of the Current Literature.

Authors:  Young Dae Cho; Sung-Eun Kim; Jeong Wook Lim; Hyuk Jai Choi; Yong Jun Cho; Jin Pyeong Jeon
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2018-04-10

Review 5.  Early Outcomes of Carotid Revascularization in Retrospective Case Series.

Authors:  Petroula Nana; George Kouvelos; Alexandros Brotis; Konstantinos Spanos; Efthimios Dardiotis; Miltiadis Matsagkas; Athanasios Giannoukas
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 4.241

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.