Literature DB >> 12498215

Evaluation of methods to predict bacterial yield using thermodynamics.

Jeanne M VanBriesen1.   

Abstract

Thermodynamic models can be used to predict bacterial yields and develop stoichiometric representation of biological reactions in the absence of empirical data. Several methods have been used by microbiologists, biotechnologists, and environmental engineers. This manuscript illustrates that these formulations are related. Yields predicted by estimation of Gibbs energy of dissipation and yields predicted by assumed efficiency of energy capture are comparable. Direct comparison of yield predictions from different methods shows the effects of assumptions inherent in the methodologies. Mathematical relationships between estimated values from the different methods help identify the best predictions from each method to bound the estimate of bacterial yield.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12498215     DOI: 10.1023/a:1020887214879

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biodegradation        ISSN: 0923-9820            Impact factor:   3.909


  14 in total

1.  Group contribution method for thermodynamic analysis of complex metabolic networks.

Authors:  Matthew D Jankowski; Christopher S Henry; Linda J Broadbelt; Vassily Hatzimanikatis
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  INDISIM-Denitrification, an individual-based model for study the denitrification process.

Authors:  Pablo Araujo-Granda; Anna Gras; Marta Ginovart; Vincent Moulton
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 3.346

3.  Glycerol/glucose co-fermentation: one more proficient process to produce propionic acid by Propionibacterium acidipropionici.

Authors:  Yin Liu; Yong-Guang Zhang; Ru-Bing Zhang; Fan Zhang; Jianhang Zhu
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 2.188

4.  Thermodynamics of microbial growth coupled to metabolism of glucose, ethanol, short-chain organic acids, and hydrogen.

Authors:  Eric E Roden; Qusheng Jin
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-01-07       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Consideration of Maintenance in Wine Fermentation Modeling.

Authors:  Alain Rapaport; Robert David; Denis Dochain; Jérôme Harmand; Thibault Nidelet
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2022-06-08

6.  Flux analysis of central metabolic pathways in Geobacter metallireducens during reduction of soluble Fe(III)-nitrilotriacetic acid.

Authors:  Yinjie J Tang; Romy Chakraborty; Héctor García Martín; Jeannie Chu; Terry C Hazen; Jay D Keasling
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2007-04-27       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Statistics-based model for prediction of chemical biosynthesis yield from Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Arul M Varman; Yi Xiao; Effendi Leonard; Yinjie J Tang
Journal:  Microb Cell Fact       Date:  2011-06-21       Impact factor: 5.328

8.  Microbial activity in the marine deep biosphere: progress and prospects.

Authors:  Beth N Orcutt; Douglas E Larowe; Jennifer F Biddle; Frederick S Colwell; Brian T Glazer; Brandi Kiel Reese; John B Kirkpatrick; Laura L Lapham; Heath J Mills; Jason B Sylvan; Scott D Wankel; C Geoff Wheat
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 5.640

9.  Toward quantitative understanding on microbial community structure and functioning: a modeling-centered approach using degradation of marine oil spills as example.

Authors:  Wilfred F M Röling; Peter M van Bodegom
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  A new model for the biodegradation kinetics of oil droplets: application to the Deepwater Horizon oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico.

Authors:  Javier Vilcáez; Li Li; Susan S Hubbard
Journal:  Geochem Trans       Date:  2013-10-20       Impact factor: 4.737

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.