OBJECTIVE: We investigated the role of phase synchronization of the spontaneous electroencephalogram (EEG) in auditory evoked potential (EP) generation in a sample of healthy individuals. METHODS: Auditory responses were obtained from 20 healthy subjects following a double stimulus paradigm, using two identical tone bursts (S1 and S2) separated by 0.5s. Single-trial auditory evoked potentials were decomposed into sinusoidal, exponentially decaying/increasing components using the piecewise Prony method (PPM). Pre- and post-stimulus phase histograms were compared to determine the degree of phase synchronization produced by auditory stimulation. RESULTS: Analysis of single responses revealed that the S1 stimuli produced phase synchronization in the 2-8Hz frequency range, with little or no concomitant amplitude increase. A significantly reduced phase effect was seen in response to S2 stimuli. CONCLUSIONS: Stimulus-induced phase synchronization of the ongoing EEG is a major mechanism for the generation of auditory EP components with a latency in the 50-250ms range. SIGNIFICANCE: The fact that the EP components accessed here are generated through phase synchronization implies that the ensemble-averaged EP will not resemble the single trial response, and it would certainly be misleading to consider the single trial response as an amplitude-scaled version of the ensemble average.
OBJECTIVE: We investigated the role of phase synchronization of the spontaneous electroencephalogram (EEG) in auditory evoked potential (EP) generation in a sample of healthy individuals. METHODS: Auditory responses were obtained from 20 healthy subjects following a double stimulus paradigm, using two identical tone bursts (S1 and S2) separated by 0.5s. Single-trial auditory evoked potentials were decomposed into sinusoidal, exponentially decaying/increasing components using the piecewise Prony method (PPM). Pre- and post-stimulus phase histograms were compared to determine the degree of phase synchronization produced by auditory stimulation. RESULTS: Analysis of single responses revealed that the S1 stimuli produced phase synchronization in the 2-8Hz frequency range, with little or no concomitant amplitude increase. A significantly reduced phase effect was seen in response to S2 stimuli. CONCLUSIONS: Stimulus-induced phase synchronization of the ongoing EEG is a major mechanism for the generation of auditory EP components with a latency in the 50-250ms range. SIGNIFICANCE: The fact that the EP components accessed here are generated through phase synchronization implies that the ensemble-averaged EP will not resemble the single trial response, and it would certainly be misleading to consider the single trial response as an amplitude-scaled version of the ensemble average.
Authors: Chella Kamarajan; Bernice Porjesz; Kevin Jones; David Chorlian; Ajayan Padmanabhapillai; Madhavi Rangaswamy; Arthur Stimus; Henri Begleiter Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2005-10-06 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Ana Maria Cebolla; Caty De Saedeleer; Ana Bengoetxea; Françoise Leurs; Costantino Balestra; Pablo d'Alcantara; Ernesto Palmero-Soler; Bernard Dan; Guy Cheron Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2009-05 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Marijn Lijffijt; Scott D Lane; Stacey L Meier; Nash N Boutros; Scott Burroughs; Joel L Steinberg; F Gerard Moeller; Alan C Swann Journal: Psychophysiology Date: 2009-06-08 Impact factor: 4.016