Literature DB >> 12495500

Power of shell-rapping signals influences physiological costs and subsequent decisions during hermit crab fights.

Mark Briffa1, Robert W Elwood.   

Abstract

Understanding the costs of signals used in fights is the key to understanding decisions made by contestants. Hermit crabs use shell rapping. This is a clearly defined agonistic signal, which can be quantified in temporal terms and in the power of the key shell-rapping signal component. We examine the relationship between the power expended by attacking hermit crabs and their consequent lactate levels. High power expenditure over the whole fight leads to high lactate, and attackers give up when lactate is high. Some defenders give up early in fights, particularly if the power of raps in early bouts they receive is high. These defenders and those not allowed to fight have low glucose, but those that successfully resist eviction have high glucose. Glucose is mobilized in an attempt to resist; nevertheless, some defenders that attempt resistance are still evicted by persistent attackers. Thus, early power of the signal is a major determinant of success for attackers, albeit at a cost. These data show the link between power, repetition of a signal, metabolic consequences and decisions of contestants in fights. The different activities, decisions and costs of the two roles are not adequately described by existing models of contests.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12495500      PMCID: PMC1691162          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2158

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  9 in total

1.  Cumulative or sequential assessment during hermit crab shell fights: effects of oxygen on decision rules.

Authors:  M Briffa; R W Elwood
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2000-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  On the enzymatic determination of blood glucose.

Authors:  E RAABO; T C TERKILDSEN
Journal:  Scand J Clin Lab Invest       Date:  1960       Impact factor: 1.713

3.  Biological signals as handicaps.

Authors:  A Grafen
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1990-06-21       Impact factor: 2.691

4.  Gradually escalating fights and displays: the cumulative assessment model.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 2.844

5.  Fighting and assessment in male cichlid fish: the effects of asymmetries in gonadal state and body size.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 2.844

6.  Causes and elimination of erratic blanks in enzymatic metabolite assays involving the use of NAD+ in alkaline hydrazine buffers: improved conditions for the assay of L-glutamate, L-lactate, and other metabolites.

Authors:  P C Engel; J B Jones
Journal:  Anal Biochem       Date:  1978-08-01       Impact factor: 3.365

7.  Dynamics of reflex cocontraction in hermit crab abdomen: experiments and a systems model.

Authors:  W D Chapple
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Decision rules, energy metabolism and vigour of hermit-crab fights.

Authors:  M Briffa; R W Elwood
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Metabolic consequences of agonistic behaviour: crab fights in declining oxygen tensions.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.844

  9 in total
  10 in total

1.  Lizard threat display handicaps endurance.

Authors:  Y Brandt
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-05-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Use of energy reserves in fighting hermit crabs.

Authors:  Mark Briffa; Robert W Elwood
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  How resource quality differentially affects motivation and ability to fight in hermit crabs.

Authors:  S Doake; R W Elwood
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Weak rappers rock more: hermit crabs assess their own agonistic behaviour.

Authors:  Elizabeth Edmonds; Mark Briffa
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 3.703

5.  Assessment of fight outcome is needed to activate socially driven transcriptional changes in the zebrafish brain.

Authors:  Rui F Oliveira; José M Simões; Magda C Teles; Catarina R Oliveira; Jorg D Becker; João S Lopes
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Fighting for shells: how private information about resource value changes hermit crab pre-fight displays and escalated fight behaviour.

Authors:  Gareth Arnott; Robert W Elwood
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Flexing the abdominals: do bigger muscles make better fighters?

Authors:  Sophie L Mowles; Peter A Cotton; Mark Briffa
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 3.703

8.  Volatile emission by contest losers revealed by real-time chemical analysis.

Authors:  Marlène Goubault; Tim P Batchelor; Robert S T Linforth; Andrew J Taylor; Ian C W Hardy
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-11-22       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Testing game theory models: fighting ability and decision rules in chameleon contests.

Authors:  Devi Stuart-Fox
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-06-22       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Point-of-care testing for measuring haemolymph glucose in invertebrates is not a valid method.

Authors:  Silas C Principe; Alessandra Augusto; Tânia M Costa
Journal:  Conserv Physiol       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 3.079

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.