Literature DB >> 11522204

Decision rules, energy metabolism and vigour of hermit-crab fights.

M Briffa1, R W Elwood.   

Abstract

Aggressive interactions between animals are often settled by the use of repeated signals that reduce the risk of injury from combat but are expected to be costly. The accumulation of lactic acid and the depletion of energy stores may constrain activity rates during and after fights and thus represent significant costs of signalling. We tested this by analysing the concentrations of lactate and glucose in the haemolymph of hermit crabs following agonistic interactions over the ownership of the gastropod shells that they inhabit. Attackers and defenders play distinct roles of sender and receiver that are fixed for the course of the encounter. Attackers perform bouts of 'shell rapping', which vary in vigour between attackers and during the course of the encounter, and are a key predictor of victory. In contrast to the agonistic behaviour of other species, we can quantify the vigour of fighting. We demonstrate, to our knowledge for the first time, an association between the vigour of aggressive activity and a proximate cost of signalling. We show that the lactate concentration in attackers increases with the amount of shell rapping, and that this appears to constrain the vigour of subsequent rapping. Furthermore, attackers, but not defenders, give up when the concentration of lactate is high. Glucose levels in attackers also increase with the amount of rapping they perform, but do not appear to influence their decision to give up. Defenders are more likely to lose when they have particularly low levels of glucose. We conclude that the two roles use different decision rules during these encounters.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11522204      PMCID: PMC1088817          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1752

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  14 in total

1.  Lizard threat display handicaps endurance.

Authors:  Y Brandt
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-05-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Use of energy reserves in fighting hermit crabs.

Authors:  Mark Briffa; Robert W Elwood
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  How resource quality differentially affects motivation and ability to fight in hermit crabs.

Authors:  S Doake; R W Elwood
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Assessment of fight outcome is needed to activate socially driven transcriptional changes in the zebrafish brain.

Authors:  Rui F Oliveira; José M Simões; Magda C Teles; Catarina R Oliveira; Jorg D Becker; João S Lopes
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Fighting for shells: how private information about resource value changes hermit crab pre-fight displays and escalated fight behaviour.

Authors:  Gareth Arnott; Robert W Elwood
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Heart rate modulation in bystanding geese watching social and non-social events.

Authors:  Claudia A F Wascher; Isabella B R Scheiber; Kurt Kotrschal
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2008-07-22       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Flexing the abdominals: do bigger muscles make better fighters?

Authors:  Sophie L Mowles; Peter A Cotton; Mark Briffa
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 3.703

8.  How does environment influence fighting? The effects of tidal flow on resource value and fighting costs in sea anemones.

Authors:  Alexandre V Palaoro; Mariana Velasque; Sandro Santos; Mark Briffa
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 3.703

9.  Testing game theory models: fighting ability and decision rules in chameleon contests.

Authors:  Devi Stuart-Fox
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-06-22       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Power of shell-rapping signals influences physiological costs and subsequent decisions during hermit crab fights.

Authors:  Mark Briffa; Robert W Elwood
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-11-22       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.