Warning: Undefined array key "mm" in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Readability of British and American medical prose at the start of the 21st century.

Literature DB >> 12493663

Readability of British and American medical prose at the start of the 21st century.

William B Weeks¹, Amy E Wallace.

Abstract

Mesh：

Year: 2002 PMID： 12493663 PMCID： PMC139036 DOI： 10.1136/bmj.325.7378.1451

Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMJ ISSN： 0959-8138

× No keyword cloud information.

3 in total

1. Comparison of review articles published in peer-reviewed and throwaway journals.

Authors: Paula A Rochon; Lisa A Bero; Ari M Bay; Jennifer L Gold; Julie M Dergal; Malcolm A Binns; David L Streiner; Jerry H Gurwitz
Journal: JAMA Date: 2002-06-05 Impact factor: 56.272

2. A new readability yardstick.

Authors: R FLESCH
Journal: J Appl Psychol Date: 1948-06

3. Effects of peer review and editing on the readability of articles published in Annals of Internal Medicine.

Authors: J C Roberts; R H Fletcher; S W Fletcher
Journal: JAMA Date: 1994-07-13 Impact factor: 56.272

3 in total

10 in total

1. Readability of British and American medical prose. Why are unreadable articles still being written?

Authors: Mark Hochhauser
Journal: BMJ Date: 2003-03-29

2. Pharmacy students' reading ability and the readability of required reading materials.

Authors: Stephen Fuller; Cheryl Horlen; Robert Cisneros; Tonja Merz
Journal: Am J Pharm Educ Date: 2007-12-15 Impact factor: 2.047

3. Evidence levels for neuroradiology articles: low agreement among raters.

Authors: J N Ramalho; G Tedesqui; M Ramalho; R S Azevedo; M Castillo
Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2015-02-12 Impact factor: 3.825

4. Introductory course on getting to know journals and on "browsing" a research paper: first steps to proficiency in scientific communication.

Authors: Valerie Matarese
Journal: Croat Med J Date: 2006-10 Impact factor: 1.351

5. Toward automated consumer question answering: automatically separating consumer questions from professional questions in the healthcare domain.

Authors: Feifan Liu; Lamont D Antieau; Hong Yu
Journal: J Biomed Inform Date: 2011-08-12 Impact factor: 6.317

Readability of British and American medical prose at the start of the 21st century.

1. Comparison of review articles published in peer-reviewed and throwaway journals.

2. A new readability yardstick.

3. Effects of peer review and editing on the readability of articles published in Annals of Internal Medicine.

1. Readability of British and American medical prose. Why are unreadable articles still being written?

2. Pharmacy students' reading ability and the readability of required reading materials.

3. Evidence levels for neuroradiology articles: low agreement among raters.

4. Introductory course on getting to know journals and on "browsing" a research paper: first steps to proficiency in scientific communication.

5. Toward automated consumer question answering: automatically separating consumer questions from professional questions in the healthcare domain.

6. The readability of editorials in popular Indian medical journals.

7. Readability of the 100 Most-Cited Neuroimaging Papers Assessed by Common Readability Formulae.

8. Empirical analysis of the text structure of original research articles in medical journals.

9. Beyond belief: a cross-genre study on perception and validation of health information online.

10. Does anybody read "evidence-based" articles?