Literature DB >> 12493635

Toward a better understanding of the perception of self-produced speech.

Linda I Shuster1, John D Durrant.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The subject of how humans hear their own voices while speaking has received sporadic attention. Previous investigations suggest that the voice is heard substantially via bone conduction, implying a different transfer function to the ear--perhaps a low-pass filter--than for purely air-conducted vocalizations. Determining the characteristics of the transfer function of self-produced speech might contribute to a better understanding of self-perception. Such information may have important implications for treating articulation disorders. The efficacy of training discrimination during the remediation of articulation disorders remains unclear, perhaps because clients are asked to discriminate either speech of others or recorded self-speech samples not readily recognized as their own. This study was conducted to determine preference for filtered self-monitored speech in a delayed feedback paradigm. Participants made immediate comparisons of their real-time speech to delayed-recorded filtered self-speech samples. Participants demonstrated a clear preference for low-pass filtered speech, supporting earlier findings, but we were unable to determine the transfer function itself. LEARNING OUTCOMES: As a result of this activity, the learner will be able to describe some reasons why an individual's tape recorded speech typically sounds different to him/her from his/her own, live speech. As a result of this activity, the learner will be able to describe some potential applications for an accurately-characterized transfer function for self-produced speech.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12493635     DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9924(02)00132-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Commun Disord        ISSN: 0021-9924            Impact factor:   2.288


  9 in total

1.  Magnetoencephalographic evidence for a precise forward model in speech production.

Authors:  Theda H Heinks-Maldonado; Srikantan S Nagarajan; John F Houde
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2006-09-18       Impact factor: 1.837

2.  The self across the senses: an fMRI study of self-face and self-voice recognition.

Authors:  Jonas T Kaplan; Lisa Aziz-Zadeh; Lucina Q Uddin; Marco Iacoboni
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  Dynamics of self-monitoring and error detection in speech production: evidence from mental imagery and MEG.

Authors:  Xing Tian; David Poeppel
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Audio-vocal monitoring system revealed by mu-rhythm activity.

Authors:  Takeshi Tamura; Atsuko Gunji; Hiroshige Takeichi; Hiroaki Shigemasu; Masumi Inagaki; Makiko Kaga; Michiteru Kitazaki
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-07-06

5.  Human auditory cortical activation during self-vocalization.

Authors:  Jeremy D W Greenlee; Adam W Jackson; Fangxiang Chen; Charles R Larson; Hiroyuki Oya; Hiroto Kawasaki; Haiming Chen; Matthew A Howard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-03-03       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Auditory traits of "own voice".

Authors:  Marino Kimura; Yuko Yotsumoto
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Neural representations of own-voice in the human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Taishi Hosaka; Marino Kimura; Yuko Yotsumoto
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Simulating thoughts to measure and study internal attention in mental health.

Authors:  Iftach Amir; Liad Ruimi; Amit Bernstein
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  The own-voice benefit for word recognition in early bilinguals.

Authors:  Sarah Cheung; Molly Babel
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-09-02
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.