Literature DB >> 12490427

Growth of young apple trees in relation to reserve nitrogen and carbohydrates.

Lailiang Cheng1, Leslie H Fuchigami.   

Abstract

Bench-grafted Fuji/M.26 apple (Malus domestica Borkh.) trees were fertilized with a nutrient solution (fertigation) containing 0, 2.5, 5, 7.5, 10, 15 or 20 mM nitrogen (N) in a modified Hoagland's solution from June 30 to September 1. In mid-October, half of the trees in each N treatment were sprayed twice with 3% urea, 1 week apart. The remaining trees served as controls. All trees were harvested after leaf fall and stored at 2 degrees C over winter. One group of trees from each treatment was destructively sampled before bud break to determine amounts of reserve N and total nonstructural carbohydrates (TNC); the remaining trees were transplanted to N-free medium in the spring. These trees were supplied with Hoagland's solution with or without 10 mM N (from 15N-depleted NH4NO3) for 60 days, starting from bud break. With increasing N supply from fertigation, tree N concentration increased, whereas TNC concentration decreased. Foliar urea applications increased tree N concentration and decreased TNC concentration in each N fertigation treatment. There was a negative linear relationship between tree N concentration and TNC concentration. Irrespective of whether N was provided the following spring, trees with high N reserves but low carbohydrate reserves produced a larger total leaf area at the end of the regrowth period than trees with low N reserves but high carbohydrate reserves. The pooled data on reserve N used for new growth showed that, regardless of the spring N supply, there was a linear relationship between total N accumulated in the tree during the previous season and the amount of reserve N remobilized for new shoot and leaf growth. About 50% of tree N content was remobilized to support new shoot and leaf growth over the range of tree N status examined. We conclude that the initial growth of young apple trees in the spring is determined mainly by reserve N, not reserve carbohydrates. The amount of reserve N remobilized for new growth in spring was proportional to tree N status and was unaffected by current N supply.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12490427     DOI: 10.1093/treephys/22.18.1297

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tree Physiol        ISSN: 0829-318X            Impact factor:   4.196


  6 in total

1.  Comparative temporal analyses of the Pinus sylvestris L. var. mongolica litv. apical bud proteome from dormancy to growth.

Authors:  Ying-Dong Bi; Zhi-Gang Wei; Zhuo Shen; Tian-Cong Lu; Yu-Xiang Cheng; Bai-Chen Wang; Chuan-Ping Yang
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 2.316

2.  Antisense inhibition of sorbitol synthesis leads to up-regulation of starch synthesis without altering CO2 assimilation in apple leaves.

Authors:  Lailiang Cheng; Rui Zhou; Edwin J Reidel; Thomas D Sharkey; Abhaya M Dandekar
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2004-09-23       Impact factor: 4.116

3.  Resorption protection. Anthocyanins facilitate nutrient recovery in autumn by shielding leaves from potentially damaging light levels.

Authors:  William A Hoch; Eric L Singsaas; Brent H McCown
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2003-10-02       Impact factor: 8.340

4.  Winter warming delays dormancy release, advances budburst, alters carbohydrate metabolism and reduces yield in a temperate shrub.

Authors:  Majken Pagter; Uffe Brandt Andersen; Lillie Andersen
Journal:  AoB Plants       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 3.276

5.  Maximum Growth Potential and Periods of Resource Limitation in Apple Tree.

Authors:  Francesco Reyes; Theodore DeJong; Pietro Franceschi; Massimo Tagliavini; Damiano Gianelle
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2016-02-29       Impact factor: 5.753

Review 6.  A molecular perspective on starch metabolism in woody tissues.

Authors:  Henrique Noronha; Angélica Silva; Zhanwu Dai; Philippe Gallusci; Adamo D Rombolà; Serge Delrot; Hernâni Gerós
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 4.116

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.