Literature DB >> 15449063

Antisense inhibition of sorbitol synthesis leads to up-regulation of starch synthesis without altering CO2 assimilation in apple leaves.

Lailiang Cheng1, Rui Zhou, Edwin J Reidel, Thomas D Sharkey, Abhaya M Dandekar.   

Abstract

Sorbitol is a primary end-product of photosynthesis in apple (Malus domestica Borkh.) and many other tree fruit species of the Rosaceae family. Sorbitol synthesis shares a common hexose phosphate pool with sucrose synthesis in the cytosol. In this study, 'Greensleeves' apple was transformed with a cDNA encoding aldose 6-phosphate reductase (A6PR, EC 1.1.1.200) in the antisense orientation. Antisense expression of A6PR decreased A6PR activity in mature leaves to approximately 15-30% of the untransformed control. The antisense plants had lower concentrations of sorbitol but higher concentrations of sucrose and starch in mature leaves at both dusk and predawn. (14)CO(2) pulse-chase labeling at ambient CO(2) demonstrated that partitioning of the newly fixed carbon to starch was significantly increased, whereas that to sucrose remained unchanged in the antisense lines with decreased sorbitol synthesis. Total activities of ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (EC 4.1.1.39), sucrose-phosphate synthase (EC 2.4.1.14), and ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase (EC 2.7.7.27) were not significantly altered in the antisense lines, whereas both stromal and cytosolic fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase (EC 3.1.3.11) activities were higher in the antisense lines with 15% of the control A6PR activity. Concentrations of glucose 6-phosphate and fructose 6-phosphate (F6P) were higher in the antisense plants than in the control, but the 3-phosphoglycerate concentration was lower in the antisense plants with 15% of the control A6PR activity. Fructose 2, 6-bisphosphate concentration increased in the antisense plants, but not to the extent expected from the increase in F6P, comparing sucrose-synthesizing species. There was no significant difference in CO(2) assimilation in response to photon flux density or intercellular CO(2) concentration. We concluded that cytosolic FBPase activity in vivo was down-regulated and starch synthesis was up-regulated in response to decreased sorbitol synthesis. As a result, CO(2) assimilation in source leaves was sustained at both ambient CO(2) and saturating CO(2).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15449063     DOI: 10.1007/s00425-004-1384-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Planta        ISSN: 0032-0935            Impact factor:   4.116


  35 in total

1.  Reduction of the cytosolic fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase in transgenic potato plants limits photosynthetic sucrose biosynthesis with no impact on plant growth and tuber yield.

Authors:  R Zrenner; K P Krause; P Apel; U Sonnewald
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 6.417

2.  An Arabidopsis thaliana knock-out mutant of the chloroplast triose phosphate/phosphate translocator is severely compromised only when starch synthesis, but not starch mobilisation is abolished.

Authors:  Anja Schneider; Rainer E Häusler; Uner Kolukisaoglu; Reinhard Kunze; Eric van der Graaff; Rainer Schwacke; Elisabetta Catoni; Marcelo Desimone; Ulf-Ingo Flügge
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 6.417

3.  Reduction of ribulose biphosphate carboxylase activase levels in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) by antisense RNA reduces ribulose biphosphate carboxylase carbamylation and impairs photosynthesis.

Authors:  C J Mate; G S Hudson; S von Caemmerer; J R Evans; T J Andrews
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 8.340

4.  Rubisco activation state decreases with increasing nitrogen content in apple leaves.

Authors:  L Cheng; L H Fuchigami
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 6.992

5.  Sorbitol metabolism and sink-source interconversions in developing apple leaves.

Authors:  W H Loescher; G C Marlow; R A Kennedy
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 8.340

6.  Compensation of decreased triose phosphate/phosphate translocator activity by accelerated starch turnover and glucose transport in transgenic tobacco.

Authors:  R E Häusler; N H Schlieben; B Schulz; U I Flügge
Journal:  Planta       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 4.116

7.  Biochemical characterization of cytosolic fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase from apple (Malus domestica) leaves.

Authors:  Rui Zhou; Lailiang Cheng
Journal:  Plant Cell Physiol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.927

8.  Transgenically enhanced sorbitol synthesis facilitates phloem boron transport and increases tolerance of tobacco to boron deficiency

Authors: 
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 8.340

9.  Export of carbon from chloroplasts at night

Authors: 
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 8.340

10.  Coarse control of sucrose-phosphate synthase in leaves: Alterations of the kinetic properties in response to the rate of photosynthesis and the accumulation of sucrose.

Authors:  M Stitt; I Wilke; R Feil; H W Heldt
Journal:  Planta       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 4.116

View more
  18 in total

1.  The use of the phosphomannose-isomerase/mannose selection system to recover transgenic apple plants.

Authors:  Juliana Degenhardt; Annika Poppe; Jurith Montag; Iris Szankowski
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  2006-06-13       Impact factor: 4.570

2.  Sorbitol Modulates Resistance to Alternaria alternata by Regulating the Expression of an NLR Resistance Gene in Apple.

Authors:  Dong Meng; Chunlong Li; Hee-Jin Park; Jonathan González; Jingying Wang; Abhaya M Dandekar; B Gillian Turgeon; Lailiang Cheng
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 11.277

3.  Phloem loading strategies and water relations in trees and herbaceous plants.

Authors:  Qiushi Fu; Lailiang Cheng; Yangdong Guo; Robert Turgeon
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2011-08-26       Impact factor: 8.340

4.  Silencing leaf sorbitol synthesis alters long-distance partitioning and apple fruit quality.

Authors:  Gianni Teo; Yasuo Suzuki; Sandie L Uratsu; Bruce Lampinen; Nichole Ormonde; William K Hu; Ted M DeJong; Abhaya M Dandekar
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-11-28       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  A member of the sugar transporter family, Stl1p is the glycerol/H+ symporter in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Célia Ferreira; Frank van Voorst; António Martins; Luisa Neves; Rui Oliveira; Morten C Kielland-Brandt; Cândida Lucas; Anders Brandt
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2005-02-09       Impact factor: 4.138

6.  Sugar levels modulate sorbitol dehydrogenase expression in maize.

Authors:  Sylvia Morais de Sousa; Mário del Giúdice Paniago; Paulo Arruda; José Andrés Yunes
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2008-06-20       Impact factor: 4.076

7.  Analyses of expressed sequence tags from apple.

Authors:  Richard D Newcomb; Ross N Crowhurst; Andrew P Gleave; Erik H A Rikkerink; Andrew C Allan; Lesley L Beuning; Judith H Bowen; Emma Gera; Kim R Jamieson; Bart J Janssen; William A Laing; Steve McArtney; Bhawana Nain; Gavin S Ross; Kimberley C Snowden; Edwige J F Souleyre; Eric F Walton; Yar-Khing Yauk
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2006-03-10       Impact factor: 8.340

8.  Phloem loading strategies in three plant species that transport sugar alcohols.

Authors:  Edwin J Reidel; Emilie A Rennie; Véronique Amiard; Lailiang Cheng; Robert Turgeon
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2009-01-07       Impact factor: 8.340

9.  A Sugar Transporter Takes Up both Hexose and Sucrose for Sorbitol-Modulated In Vitro Pollen Tube Growth in Apple.

Authors:  Chunlong Li; Dong Meng; Miguel A Piñeros; Yuxin Mao; Abhaya M Dandekar; Lailiang Cheng
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 11.277

Review 10.  In vitro tissue culture of apple and other Malus species: recent advances and applications.

Authors:  Jaime A Teixeira da Silva; Andrea Gulyás; Katalin Magyar-Tábori; Min-Rui Wang; Qiao-Chun Wang; Judit Dobránszki
Journal:  Planta       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 4.116

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.