Literature DB >> 12489757

Quantifying temporal bone morphology of great apes and humans: an approach using geometric morphometrics.

Charles A Lockwood1, John M Lynch, William H Kimbel.   

Abstract

The hominid temporal bone offers a complex array of morphology that is linked to several different functional systems. Its frequent preservation in the fossil record gives the temporal bone added significance in the study of human evolution, but its morphology has proven difficult to quantify. In this study we use techniques of 3D geometric morphometrics to quantify differences among humans and great apes and discuss the results in a phylogenetic context. Twenty-three landmarks on the ectocranial surface of the temporal bone provide a high level of anatomical detail. Generalized Procrustes analysis (GPA) is used to register (adjust for position, orientation and scale) landmark data from 405 adults representing Homo, Pan, Gorilla and Pongo. Principal components analysis of residuals from the GPA shows that the major source of variation is between humans and apes. Human characteristics such as a coronally orientated petrous axis, a deep mandibular fossa, a projecting mastoid process, and reduced lateral extension of the tympanic element strongly impact the analysis. In phenetic cluster analyses, gorillas and orangutans group together with respect to chimpanzees, and all apes group together with respect to humans. Thus, the analysis contradicts depictions of African apes as a single morphotype. Gorillas and orangutans lack the extensive preglenoid surface of chimpanzees, and their mastoid processes are less medially inflected. These and other characters shared by gorillas and orangutans are probably primitive for the African hominid clade.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12489757      PMCID: PMC1570994          DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-7580.2002.00122.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anat        ISSN: 0021-8782            Impact factor:   2.610


  20 in total

1.  Geometric morphometric study of the regional variation of modern human craniofacial form.

Authors:  Robin J Hennessy; Chris B Stringer
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.868

2.  The anatomy of the articular fossa (fossa mandibularis) in man and apes.

Authors:  E H ASHTON; S ZUCKERMAN
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  1954-03       Impact factor: 2.868

3.  Observations on the anatomy of the fossil Australopithecinae.

Authors:  W E Clark
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  1947-07       Impact factor: 2.610

4.  Facial growth in Cercocebus torquatus: an application of three-dimensional geometric morphometric techniques to the study of morphological variation.

Authors:  P O'Higgins; N Jones
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 5.  A reappraisal of early hominid phylogeny.

Authors:  D S Strait; F E Grine; M A Moniz
Journal:  J Hum Evol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 3.895

6.  The temporal bones from Sima de los Huesos Middle Pleistocene site (Sierra de Atapuerca, Spain). A phylogenetic approach.

Authors:  I Martínez; J L Arsuaga
Journal:  J Hum Evol       Date:  1997 Aug-Sep       Impact factor: 3.895

7.  Basicranial anatomy of Plio-Pleistocene hominids from East and South Africa.

Authors:  M C Dean; B A Wood
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 2.868

8.  Neanderthal cranial ontogeny and its implications for late hominid diversity.

Authors:  M S Ponce de León; C P Zollikofer
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-08-02       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Geometric morphometrics in primatology: craniofacial variation in Homo sapiens and Pan troglodytes.

Authors:  J M Lynch; C G Wood; S A Luboga
Journal:  Folia Primatol (Basel)       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 1.246

10.  Paedomorphosis and neoteny in the pygmy chimpanzee.

Authors:  B T Shea
Journal:  Science       Date:  1983-11-04       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  20 in total

1.  Why should we investigate the morphological disparity of plant clades?

Authors:  Jack W Oyston; Martin Hughes; Sylvain Gerber; Matthew A Wills
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 4.357

2.  The shape of the hominoid proximal femur: a geometric morphometric analysis.

Authors:  Elizabeth H Harmon
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.610

3.  Relative Wulst volume is correlated with orbit orientation and binocular visual field in birds.

Authors:  Andrew N Iwaniuk; Christopher P Heesy; Margaret I Hall; Douglas R W Wylie
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2007-12-11       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 4.  Cranial base evolution within the hominin clade.

Authors:  L Nevell; B Wood
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 5.  The evolutionary history of the hominin hand since the last common ancestor of Pan and Homo.

Authors:  Matthew W Tocheri; Caley M Orr; Marc C Jacofsky; Mary W Marzke
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.610

6.  Measurement error of 3D cranial landmarks of an ontogenetic sample using Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Jimena Barbeito-Andrés; Marisol Anzelmo; Fernando Ventrice; Marina L Sardi
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2012-06-18

7.  Measurement error in μCT-based three-dimensional geometric morphometrics introduced by surface generation and landmark data acquisition.

Authors:  Karolin Engelkes; Jennice Helfsgott; Jörg U Hammel; Sebastian Büsse; Thomas Kleinteich; André Beerlink; Stanislav N Gorb; Alexander Haas
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 2.610

8.  Ontogeny of the female femur: geometric morphometric analysis applied on current living individuals of a Spanish population.

Authors:  Aniol Pujol; Carme Rissech; Jacint Ventura; Joaquim Badosa; Daniel Turbón
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 2.610

9.  Morphometrics and hominoid phylogeny: Support for a chimpanzee-human clade and differentiation among great ape subspecies.

Authors:  Charles A Lockwood; William H Kimbel; John M Lynch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-03-22       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  A quantitative method for the evaluation of three-dimensional structure of temporal bone pneumatization.

Authors:  Cheryl A Hill; Joan T Richtsmeier
Journal:  J Hum Evol       Date:  2008-08-19       Impact factor: 3.895

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.