Literature DB >> 12488802

Pulse configuration-dependent effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on visual perception.

Andrea Antal1, Tamas Z Kincses, Michael A Nitsche, Orsolya Bartfai, Iris Demmer, Martin Sommer, Walter Paulus.   

Abstract

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a noninvasive technique for direct stimulation of the neocortex. In the last two decades it is successfully applied in the study of motor and sensory physiology. TMS uses the indirect induction of electrical fields in the brain generated by intense changes of magnetic fields applied to the scalp. It encompasses two widely used waveform configurations: mono-phasic magnetic pulses induce a single current in the brain while biphasic pulses induce at least two currents of inverse direction. As has been shown for the motor cortex, efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) may depend on pulse configuration. In order to clarify this question with regard to visual perception, static contrast sensitivities (sCS) were evaluated before, during, immediately after and 10 minutes after monophasic and biphasic low frequency (1 Hz) rTMS applied to the occipital cortex of 15 healthy subjects. The intensity of stimulation was the phosphene threshold of each individual subject. Using 4 c/d spatial frequency, significant sCS loss was found during and immediately after 10 min of monophasic stimulation, while biphasic stimulation resulted in no significant effect. Ten minutes after the end of stimulation, the sCS values were at baseline level again. However, reversed current flow direction resulted in an increased efficacy of biphasic and decreased efficacy of monophasic stimulation. Our results are in agreement with previous findings showing that primary visual functions, such as contrast detection, can be transiently altered by low frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation. However the effect of modulation significantly depends on the current waveform and direction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12488802     DOI: 10.1097/00001756-200212030-00013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroreport        ISSN: 0959-4965            Impact factor:   1.837


  14 in total

1.  Phosphene threshold as a function of contrast of external visual stimuli.

Authors:  Andreas M Rauschecker; Sven Bestmann; Vincent Walsh; Kai V Thilo
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-05-26       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  A transcranial magnetic stimulator inducing near-rectangular pulses with controllable pulse width (cTMS).

Authors:  Angel V Peterchev; Reza Jalinous; Sarah H Lisanby
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 4.538

Review 3.  The development and modelling of devices and paradigms for transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Stefan M Goetz; Zhi-De Deng
Journal:  Int Rev Psychiatry       Date:  2017-04-26

4.  Enhancement of Neuromodulation with Novel Pulse Shapes Generated by Controllable Pulse Parameter Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.

Authors:  Stefan M Goetz; Bruce Luber; Sarah H Lisanby; David L K Murphy; I Cassie Kozyrkov; Warren M Grill; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 8.955

5.  Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulator with controllable pulse parameters.

Authors:  Angel V Peterchev; David L Murphy; Sarah H Lisanby
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 5.379

Review 6.  Electroconvulsive therapy stimulus parameters: rethinking dosage.

Authors:  Angel V Peterchev; Moacyr A Rosa; Zhi-De Deng; Joan Prudic; Sarah H Lisanby
Journal:  J ECT       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.635

Review 7.  Consensus: New methodologies for brain stimulation.

Authors:  Ying-Zu Huang; Martin Sommer; Gary Thickbroom; Masashi Hamada; Alvero Pascual-Leonne; Walter Paulus; Joseph Classen; Angel V Peterchev; Abraham Zangen; Yoshikazu Ugawa
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2008-10-07       Impact factor: 8.955

8.  Improved discrimination of visual stimuli following repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Michael L Waterston; Christopher C Pack
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Manipulation of phosphene thresholds by transcranial direct current stimulation in man.

Authors:  Andrea Antal; Tamás Z Kincses; Michael A Nitsche; Walter Paulus
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-04-16       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Assessing temporal processing of facial emotion perception with transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Yuri Rassovsky; Junghee Lee; Poorang Nori; Allan D Wu; Marco Iacoboni; Bruno G Breitmeyer; Gerhard Hellemann; Michael F Green
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 2.708

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.