Literature DB >> 12488115

Relative lengths of fingers and toes in human males and females.

Dennis McFadden1, Erin Shubel.   

Abstract

Digital scans of the hands and feet were obtained from 62 heterosexual females and 60 heterosexual males. Scans only of the hands were obtained from 29 homosexual females and 35 homosexual males. The lengths of the individual fingers and toes were estimated from those images by two experienced judges, and length ratios were constructed for all possible pairs of fingers (or toes) on each hand (or foot). Thumbs were not measured, but the great toe was measured and used to construct length ratios. Past research had concentrated on the relative lengths of the index and ring fingers (the 2D:4D ratio). This ratio is close to 1.0 in females and smaller than 1.0 in males. Here 2D:4D did exhibit the largest sex difference, for both hands, followed by 2D:5D and 3D:4D. The sex differences were larger for the right hand than for the left. For both homosexual females and homosexual males, nearly all of the length ratios for fingers were intermediate to those for heterosexual females and heterosexual males; that is, the ratios of homosexual females were masculinized and those of homosexual males were hypomasculinized, but few of these differences were significant. Because many toes were substantially arched, acceptable estimates of length often could not be obtained from the two-dimensional scans, meaning that conclusions about toes are much less certain than those for fingers. Nevertheless, the length ratios were generally larger for toes than for fingers, and the sex differences were generally smaller for toes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12488115     DOI: 10.1006/hbeh.2002.1833

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Horm Behav        ISSN: 0018-506X            Impact factor:   3.587


  42 in total

1.  Index and ring finger ratio--a morphologic sex determinant in South-Indian children.

Authors:  Tanuj Kanchan; G Pradeep Kumar
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 2.007

2.  How well does second-to-fourth-digit ratio in hands correlate with other indications of masculinity in males?

Authors:  Nicole Koehler; Leigh W Simmons; Gillian Rhodes
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Digit length may reveal unusual breeding behaviour in a seabird.

Authors:  Meritxell Genovart; Maite Louzao; José M Igual; Daniel Oro
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2008-10-23       Impact factor: 3.703

4.  Avian hind-limb digit length ratios measured from radiographs are sexually dimorphic.

Authors:  Barbara Leoni; Diego Rubolini; Maria Romano; Mauro di Giancamillo; Nicola Saino
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2008-08-06       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 5.  Sexual orientation and the auditory system.

Authors:  Dennis McFadden
Journal:  Front Neuroendocrinol       Date:  2011-02-12       Impact factor: 8.606

6.  Does digit ratio (2D:4D) predict penile length?

Authors:  Denise Brooks McQuade
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2011-07-04       Impact factor: 3.285

7.  Cross-sectional data on soft tissue morphometry of the growing hand and fingers of dextral individuals 5-65 years old.

Authors:  T M Mayhew
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2012-08-07       Impact factor: 2.610

8.  Sex and race differences in the relative lengths of metacarpals and metatarsals in human skeletons.

Authors:  Dennis McFadden; Mary S Bracht
Journal:  Early Hum Dev       Date:  2008-09-11       Impact factor: 2.079

9.  Digit ratio (2Dratio4D) differences between 20 strains of inbred mice.

Authors:  Reginia H Y Yan; Mark Bunning; Douglas Wahlsten; Peter L Hurd
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-06-04       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Sexual dimorphism in the prenatal digit ratio (2D:4D).

Authors:  Frietson Galis; Clara M A Ten Broek; Stefan Van Dongen; Liliane C D Wijnaendts
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2009-03-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.