Literature DB >> 12482468

Preference for higher sucrose concentrations in cocaine abusing-dependent patients.

David S Janowsky1, Olgierd Pucilowski, Michael Buyinza.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Animal studies suggest that preference for relatively high concentrations of sweet solutions and lack of control over sweet solution consumption is related to a preference for alcohol over water. There also is evidence in humans that alcoholics prefer high concentration sweet solutions. This study was designed to determine whether patients with cocaine use disorder also prefer high concentrations of sweet solutions.
METHODS: Sixteen patients with cocaine abuse/dependency were compared with 16 inpatient controls with an affective disorder as to their preferences for increasing concentrations of sucrose solutions. Patients were administered aqueous sucrose solutions ranging from 0.05 to 0.83 M. They were then asked to rate their degree of preference for, and the degree of sweetness of each solution.
RESULTS: Cocaine abusing/dependent patients significantly more often preferred the highest sucrose concentration (0.83 M).
CONCLUSIONS: The above information suggests that cocaine abusing/dependent patients, like alcoholics, and in contrast to inpatient controls, share a preference for high concentrations of sucrose.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12482468     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3956(02)00063-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psychiatr Res        ISSN: 0022-3956            Impact factor:   4.791


  18 in total

1.  Cocaine-induced reward enhancement measured with intracranial self-stimulation in rats bred for low versus high saccharin intake.

Authors:  Anna K Radke; Natalie E Zlebnik; Nathan A Holtz; Marilyn E Carroll
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.293

2.  Intracranial self-stimulation reward thresholds during morphine withdrawal in rats bred for high (HiS) and low (LoS) saccharin intake.

Authors:  Nathan A Holtz; Anna K Radke; Natalie E Zlebnik; Andrew C Harris; Marilyn E Carroll
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 3.252

3.  Genetics of sweet taste preferences.

Authors:  Alexander A Bachmanov; Natalia P Bosak; Wely B Floriano; Masashi Inoue; Xia Li; Cailu Lin; Vladimir O Murovets; Danielle R Reed; Vasily A Zolotarev; Gary K Beauchamp
Journal:  Flavour Fragr J       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.576

4.  Sweet taste pleasantness is modulated by morphine and naltrexone.

Authors:  Marie Eikemo; Guro E Løseth; Tom Johnstone; Johannes Gjerstad; Frode Willoch; Siri Leknes
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Regulation of intravenous cocaine self-administration in rats selectively bred for high (HiS) and low (LoS) saccharin intake.

Authors:  Marilyn E Carroll; Marissa M Anderson; Andrew D Morgan
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2006-12-12       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Cocaine withdrawal in rats selectively bred for low (LoS) versus high (HiS) saccharin intake.

Authors:  Anna K Radke; Natalie E Zlebnik; Marilyn E Carroll
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 3.533

7.  Reduced emotional signs of opiate withdrawal in rats selectively bred for low (LoS) versus high (HiS) saccharin intake.

Authors:  Anna K Radke; Nathan A Holtz; Jonathan C Gewirtz; Marilyn E Carroll
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Repeated Cocaine Experience Facilitates Sucrose-Reinforced Operant Responding in Enriched and Isolated Rats.

Authors:  Emily D Klein; Brenda J Gehrke; Thomas A Green; Thomas R Zentall; Michael T Bardo
Journal:  Learn Motiv       Date:  2007-02

9.  A preference test for sweet taste that uses edible strips.

Authors:  Gregory Smutzer; Janki Y Patel; Judith C Stull; Ray A Abarintos; Neiladri K Khan; Kevin C Park
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2013-11-10       Impact factor: 3.868

10.  Sweet taste liking is associated with subjective response to amphetamine in women but not men.

Authors:  Jessica Weafer; Nicholas Lyon; Donald Hedeker; Harriet de Wit
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 4.530

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.