Literature DB >> 12481003

Loss of heterozygosity associated with uniparental disomy in breast carcinoma.

Sabita K Murthy1, Lisa M DiFrancesco, R Travis Ogilvie, Douglas J Demetrick.   

Abstract

Loss of heterozygosity is commonly assumed to be due to deletion of the appropriate genomic region in one chromosome within a neoplastic cell but may be due to other mechanisms such as mitotic non-disjunction or somatic recombination leading to uniparental heterodisomy. We chose to study the genomic regions surrounding the p53 and RB1 tumor suppressor genes in breast carcinoma to evaluate the different mechanisms that could mediate loss of heterozygosity. A microsatellite analysis of polymorphic markers in 50 breast cancer samples showed loss of heterozygosity for at least 1 of the 10 markers analyzed in 50% of the tumors studied, and an overall 8.47% of the informative loci showed loss of heterozygosity. All of the cases with loss of heterozygosity were further analyzed for gene copy number of the tumor suppressor genes RB1 and p53 by fluorescence in situ hybridization of either tumor touch preparations or microdissected tumor nuclei with specific genomic probes. Surprisingly, all samples showed the presence of both copies of tumor suppressor genes, including 4/50 cases showing loss of heterozygosity of tumor suppressor gene-spanning markers. One of the 4 cases showed loss of heterozygosity of markers spanning a distance of 6 cM over the RB1 gene, with normal copy numbers of the gene. Three other cases showed loss of heterozygosity of markers within the tumor suppressor gene (RBI or p53) and at least one other spanning marker. No cases showed a simultaneous reduction to homozygosity of markers both near the tumor suppressor gene and distal loci. We suggest that the presence of both copies of the tumor suppressor gene in the cases with loss of heterozygosity of spanning markers and internal markers for that tumor suppressor gene could be explained by somatic recombination resulting in uniparental disomy, but not mitotic nondisjunction or deletion. As the mechanism for physical deletion of a chromosome may be different from those mediating somatic recombination, study of this phenomenon may identify different pathways of genomic instability that may be of diagnostic or treatment significance in breast or other cancers, particularly in those treatments based upon DNA-altering agents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12481003     DOI: 10.1097/01.MP.0000032535.62750.D1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mod Pathol        ISSN: 0893-3952            Impact factor:   7.842


  17 in total

1.  Uniparentalism in sporadic colorectal cancer is independent of imprint status, and coordinate for chromosomes 14 and 18.

Authors:  Huferesh K Darbary; Smitha S Dutt; Sheila J Sait; Norma J Nowak; Roy E Heinaman; Daniel L Stoler; Garth R Anderson
Journal:  Cancer Genet Cytogenet       Date:  2009-03

2.  Exome sequencing identifies MAX mutations as a cause of hereditary pheochromocytoma.

Authors:  Iñaki Comino-Méndez; Francisco J Gracia-Aznárez; Francesca Schiavi; Iñigo Landa; Luis J Leandro-García; Rocío Letón; Emiliano Honrado; Rocío Ramos-Medina; Daniela Caronia; Guillermo Pita; Alvaro Gómez-Graña; Aguirre A de Cubas; Lucía Inglada-Pérez; Agnieszka Maliszewska; Elisa Taschin; Sara Bobisse; Giuseppe Pica; Paola Loli; Rafael Hernández-Lavado; José A Díaz; Mercedes Gómez-Morales; Anna González-Neira; Giovanna Roncador; Cristina Rodríguez-Antona; Javier Benítez; Massimo Mannelli; Giuseppe Opocher; Mercedes Robledo; Alberto Cascón
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2011-06-19       Impact factor: 38.330

3.  sCNAphase: using haplotype resolved read depth to genotype somatic copy number alterations from low cellularity aneuploid tumors.

Authors:  Wenhan Chen; Alan J Robertson; Devika Ganesamoorthy; Lachlan J M Coin
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 4.  Mutant allele specific imbalance in oncogenes with copy number alterations: Occurrence, mechanisms, and potential clinical implications.

Authors:  Chih-Chieh Yu; Wanglong Qiu; Caroline S Juang; Mahesh M Mansukhani; Balazs Halmos; Gloria H Su
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2016-10-08       Impact factor: 8.679

5.  Association between acquired uniparental disomy and homozygous mutations and HER2/ER/PR status in breast cancer.

Authors:  Musaffe Tuna; Marcel Smid; Dakai Zhu; John W M Martens; Christopher I Amos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Genomic structure of chromosome 17 deletions in BRCA1-associated ovarian cancers.

Authors:  Karen M Chisholm; Barbara A Goff; Rochelle Garcia; Mary-Claire King; Elizabeth M Swisher
Journal:  Cancer Genet Cytogenet       Date:  2008-05

Review 7.  Copy neutral loss of heterozygosity: a novel chromosomal lesion in myeloid malignancies.

Authors:  Christine O'Keefe; Michael A McDevitt; Jaroslaw P Maciejewski
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2010-01-27       Impact factor: 22.113

8.  Comparable frequency of BRCA1, BRCA2 and TP53 germline mutations in a multi-ethnic Asian cohort suggests TP53 screening should be offered together with BRCA1/2 screening to early-onset breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Daphne S C Lee; Sook-Yee Yoon; Lai Meng Looi; Peter Kang; In Nee Kang; Kavitta Sivanandan; Hany Ariffin; Meow Keong Thong; Kin Fah Chin; Nur Aishah Mohd Taib; Cheng-Har Yip; Soo-Hwang Teo
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 6.466

Review 9.  Array-CGH and breast cancer.

Authors:  Erik H van Beers; Petra M Nederlof
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2006-06-30       Impact factor: 6.466

10.  Soft tissue sarcoma subtypes exhibit distinct patterns of acquired uniparental disomy.

Authors:  Musaffe Tuna; Zhenlin Ju; Christopher I Amos; Gordon B Mills
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 3.063

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.