Literature DB >> 12479360

Pluripotent stem cells--model of embryonic development, tool for gene targeting, and basis of cell therapy.

Katja Prelle1, Nicola Zink, Eckhard Wolf.   

Abstract

Embryonic stem (ES) cells are pluripotent cell lines with the capacity of self-renewal and a broad differentiation plasticity. They are derived from pre-implantation embryos and can be propagated as a homogeneous, uncommitted cell population for an almost unlimited period of time without losing their pluripotency and their stable karyotype. Murine ES cells are able to reintegrate fully into embryogenesis when returned into an early embryo, even after extensive genetic manipulation. In the resulting chimeric offspring produced by blastocyst injection or morula aggregation, ES cell descendants are represented among all cell types, including functional gametes. Therefore, mouse ES cells represent an important tool for genetic engineering, in particular via homologous recombination, to introduce gene knock-outs and other precise genomic modifications into the mouse germ line. Because of these properties ES cell technology is of high interest for other model organisms and for livestock species like cattle and pigs. However, in spite of tremendous research activities, no proven ES cells colonizing the germ line have yet been established for vertebrate species other than the mouse (Evans and Kaufman, 1981; Martin, 1981) and chicken (Pain et al., 1996). The in vitro differentiation capacity of ES cells provides unique opportunities for experimental analysis of gene regulation and function during cell commitment and differentiation in early embryogenesis. Recently, pluripotent stem cells were established from human embryos (Thomson et al., 1998) and early fetuses (Shamblott et al., 1998), opening new scenarios both for research in human developmental biology and for medical applications, i.e. cell replacement strategies. At about the same time, research activities focused on characteristics and differentiation potential of somatic stem cells, unravelling an unexpected plasticity of these cell types. Somatic stem cells are found in differentiated tissues and can renew themselves in addition to generating the specialized cell types of the tissue from which they originate. Additional to discoveries of somatic stem cells in tissues that were previously not thought to contain these kinds of cells, they also appear to be capable of developing into cell types of other tissues, but have a reduced differentiation potential as compared to embryo-derived stem cells. Therefore, somatic stem cells are referred to as multipotent rather than pluripotent. This review summarizes characteristics of pluripotent stem cells in the mouse and in selected livestock species, explains their use for genetic engineering and basic research on embryonic development, and evaluates their potential for cell therapy as compared to somatic stem cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12479360     DOI: 10.1046/j.1439-0264.2002.00388.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anat Histol Embryol        ISSN: 0340-2096            Impact factor:   1.114


  27 in total

1.  Macroporous hydrogels based on 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate. Part III. Hydrogels as carriers for immobilization of proteins.

Authors:  J Michálek; M Prádný; A Artyukhov; M Slouf; K Smetana
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  Enhancement of extra chromosomal recombination in somatic cells by affecting the ratio of homologous recombination (HR) to non-homologous end joining (NHEJ).

Authors:  Gretchen M Zaunbrecher; Patrick W Dunne; Bashir Mir; Matthew Breen; Jorge A Piedrahita
Journal:  Anim Biotechnol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.282

Review 3.  Stem cell bioprocessing: fundamentals and principles.

Authors:  Mark R Placzek; I-Ming Chung; Hugo M Macedo; Siti Ismail; Teresa Mortera Blanco; Mayasari Lim; Jae Min Cha; Iliana Fauzi; Yunyi Kang; David C L Yeo; Chi Yip Joan Ma; Julia M Polak; Nicki Panoskaltsis; Athanasios Mantalaris
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Long noncoding RNAs in mouse embryonic stem cell pluripotency and differentiation.

Authors:  Marcel E Dinger; Paulo P Amaral; Tim R Mercer; Ken C Pang; Stephen J Bruce; Brooke B Gardiner; Marjan E Askarian-Amiri; Kelin Ru; Giulia Soldà; Cas Simons; Susan M Sunkin; Mark L Crowe; Sean M Grimmond; Andrew C Perkins; John S Mattick
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 5.  Very small embryonic-like stem cells in adult tissues-potential implications for aging.

Authors:  E K Zuba-Surma; W Wu; J Ratajczak; M Kucia; M Z Ratajczak
Journal:  Mech Ageing Dev       Date:  2008-02-14       Impact factor: 5.432

6.  From embryonic stem cells to iPS - an ethical perspective.

Authors:  J Suaudeau
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 6.831

7.  Identification of a cell-of-origin for fibroblasts comprising the fibrotic reticulum in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.

Authors:  Hong Xia; Vidya Bodempudi; Alexey Benyumov; Polla Hergert; Damien Tank; Jeremy Herrera; Jeff Braziunas; Ola Larsson; Matthew Parker; Daniel Rossi; Karen Smith; Mark Peterson; Andrew Limper; Jose Jessurun; John Connett; David Ingbar; Sem Phan; Peter B Bitterman; Craig A Henke
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 4.307

8.  Derivation of buffalo embryonic stem-like cells from in vitro-produced blastocysts on homologous and heterologous feeder cells.

Authors:  Dharmendra Kumar; T Anand; K P Singh; M K Singh; R A Shah; M S Chauhan; P Palta; S K Singla; R S Manik
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2011-05-04       Impact factor: 3.412

9.  Sodium butyrate and dexamethasone promote exocrine pancreatic gene expression in mouse embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Meng Ren; Li Yan; Chang-zhen Shang; Jun Cao; Fang-ping Li; Jing-yi Li; Hua Cheng; Jun Min
Journal:  Acta Pharmacol Sin       Date:  2009-08-24       Impact factor: 6.150

10.  Effect of dihydrotestosterone on mouse embryonic stem cells exposed to H2O2-induced oxidative stress.

Authors:  Mi Na Lee; Sang Hun Lee; Min Young Lee; Yun Hee Kim; Jae Hong Park; Jung Min Ryu; Seung Pil Yun; Yu Jin Lee; Mi Ok Kim; Kwangsung Park; Ho Jae Han
Journal:  J Vet Sci       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.672

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.