Literature DB >> 12478582

Utility of three types of mass spectrometers for determining elemental compositions of ions formed from chromatographically separated compounds.

Andrew H Grange1, Floyd A Genicola, G Wayne Sovocool.   

Abstract

Concentration factors of 1000 and more reveal dozens of compounds in extracts of water supplies. Library mass spectra for most of these compounds are not available, and alternative means of identification are needed. Determination of the elemental compositions of the ions in mass spectra makes feasible searches of commercial and chemical literature that often lead to compound identification. Instrumental capabilities that constrain the utility of a mass spectrometer for determining ion compositions for compounds that elute from a chromatographic column are scan speed, mass accuracy, linear dynamic range, and resolving power. Mass peak profiling from selected ion recording data (MPPSIRD) performed with a double-focusing mass spectrometer provides the best combination of these capabilities. This technique provides unique ion compositions for ions of higher mass from compounds eluting from a gas chromatograph than can be obtained by orthogonal acceleration time-of-flight (oa-TOF) or Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry. Multiple compositions are usually possible for an ion with a mass exceeding 150 Da within the error limits of the mass measurement. The correct composition is selected based on measured exact masses of the mass peak profiles resulting from isotopic ions higher in mass by 1 and 2 Da and accurate measurement of the summed abundances of these isotopic ions relative to the monoisotopic ion. A profile generation model (PGM) automatically determines which compositions are consistent with measured exact masses and relative abundances. The utility of oa-TOF and double-focusing mass spectrometry using ion composition elucidation (MPPSIRD plus the PGM) are considered for determining ion compositions of two compounds found in drinking water extracts and a third compound from a monitoring well at a landfill. Published in 2002 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12478582     DOI: 10.1002/rcm.842

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom        ISSN: 0951-4198            Impact factor:   2.419


  4 in total

1.  Assigning product ions from complex MS/MS spectra: the importance of mass uncertainty and resolving power.

Authors:  Lekha Sleno; Dietrich A Volmer; Alan G Marshall
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.109

2.  Kendrick Mass Defect Approach Combined to NORINE Database for Molecular Formula Assignment of Nonribosomal Peptides.

Authors:  Mickaël Chevalier; Emma Ricart; Emeline Hanozin; Maude Pupin; Philippe Jacques; Nicolas Smargiasso; Edwin De Pauw; Frédérique Lisacek; Valérie Leclère; Christophe Flahaut
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2019-10-28       Impact factor: 3.109

3.  Advances in structure elucidation of small molecules using mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Tobias Kind; Oliver Fiehn
Journal:  Bioanal Rev       Date:  2010-08-21

4.  Metabolomic database annotations via query of elemental compositions: mass accuracy is insufficient even at less than 1 ppm.

Authors:  Tobias Kind; Oliver Fiehn
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2006-04-28       Impact factor: 3.169

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.