Literature DB >> 12478396

The control of foot force during pushing efforts against a moving pedal.

Kreg G Gruben1, Citlali López-Ortiz, Matthew W Schmidt.   

Abstract

The muscle component of the force applied to a bicycle pedal (foot force) by seated humans provided insight into the organization of the motor system. Healthy adults ( n=11) pedaled a stationary cycle ergometer while attempting to match peak foot force magnitude to visually presented force targets (200, 250,., 650 N). Pedaling cadence was maintained at 60 rpm by a motor. Measurements of the foot force, pedal angle, and crank angle were recorded. The experimental design and data analysis allowed the isolation of the muscle component of the foot force from the contributions due to gravity and inertia. A graphical representation of the muscle component of the foot force (force path) was created for each of several crank angles throughout the extension phase of the pedaling cycle. The force paths showed several highly conserved characteristics across participants and crank angles. Each force path occupied a narrow range in force space despite the ability of the participants to produce force in a wide region of force space. Three control strategies were observed in the geometry of the force paths. Eighty five percent of the force paths were linear for six of the participants, and 79% of the force paths had second-order curvature for the other five participants. The curvature was concave to the posterior for four of the participants and concave to the anterior for one participant. The linear force paths were consistent with the previously reported linear nature of the force paths for pushes against a quasi-static pedal. The observation of simple force path geometry for two tasks with dissimilar dynamic characteristics suggests that this aspect of foot force control may be common to a range of lower limb tasks and may reflect a mechanism by which the nervous system organizes the control of foot force.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12478396     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-002-1276-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  4 in total

1.  Biomechanical capabilities influence postural control strategies in the cat hindlimb.

Authors:  J Lucas McKay; Thomas J Burkholder; Lena H Ting
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2006-12-06       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Foot force direction in an isometric pushing task: prediction by kinematic and musculoskeletal models.

Authors:  M W Schmidt; C López-Ortiz; P S Barrett; L M Rogers; K G Gruben
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-04-08       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Experimentally quantifying the feasible torque space of the human shoulder.

Authors:  Emma M Baillargeon; Daniel Ludvig; M Hongchul Sohn; Constantine P Nicolozakes; Amee L Seitz; Eric J Perreault
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 2.368

4.  Effects of kinematic complexity and number of muscles on musculoskeletal model robustness to muscle dysfunction.

Authors:  M Hongchul Sohn; Daniel M Smith; Lena H Ting
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.