Literature DB >> 12477962

Analysis of donor heterogeneity as a factor affecting the clinical outcome of oocyte donation.

Sarah E Harris1, Malcolm Faddy, Stephen Levett, Vinay Sharma, Roger Gosden.   

Abstract

This study investigated factors that may affect the clinical outcome of oocyte donation on the basis of data from a clinical programme involving 243 treatment cycles analysed retrospectively. In each cohort, oocytes were distributed randomly to one, two or three recipients, which enabled the outcomes in terms of pregnancy and live birth rates to be compared among donors. The results were compared with respect to age of the donor and recipient, number of oocytes collected, fertilization and cleavage rates, qualitative embryo criteria (morphological grade) and other clinical criteria. Most variables had no significant effect on either outcome, although the live birth rate varied inversely with recipient age. Unsurprisingly, the pregnancy rate was correlated positively with the number of embryos transferred. Most of the variation in pregnancy and live birth rates (85-90%) could not be accounted for by any specific donation characteristic, indicating that interdonor heterogeneity was the result of idiopathic factors. The factor most predictive of a recipient's cycle outcome was a history of previous success of the donor, which accounted for approximately 30% of the variation in live birth rates. Pregnancy success rates varied widely among oocyte donors, as has been found among sperm donors. This observation highlights the need to identify markers that predict developmental competence and help to identify the genetic and environmental bases of differential fertility. In conclusion, the quality of oocytes varied widely among women presumed to be fertile by clinical criteria, and the causative factors set a major limitation on the prospects of improving the outcome of egg donation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12477962     DOI: 10.1080/1464727022000199112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Fertil (Camb)        ISSN: 1464-7273            Impact factor:   2.767


  5 in total

1.  A shared egg donor program: which is the minimum number of oocytes to be allocated?

Authors:  Demian Glujovsky; Marcelo Dominguez; Gabriel Fiszbajn; Sergio Papier; Mariano Lavolpe; Carlos Sueldo
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2010-11-19       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Is younger better? Donor age less than 25 does not predict more favorable outcomes after in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  Leigh A Humphries; Laura E Dodge; Erin B Kennedy; Kathryn C Humm; Michele R Hacker; Denny Sakkas
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Total number of oocytes and zygotes are predictive of live birth pregnancy in fresh donor oocyte in vitro fertilization cycles.

Authors:  Eduardo Hariton; Keewan Kim; Sunni L Mumford; Marissa Palmor; Pietro Bortoletto; Eden R Cardozo; Anatte E Karmon; Mary E Sabatini; Aaron K Styer
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  Anti-Müllerian hormone serum level and other markers associated with pregnancy outcome in oocyte donation.

Authors:  Anne-Sophie Delesalle; Geoffroy Robin; Patricia Thomas-Desrousseaux; Didier Dewailly; Sophie Catteau-Jonard
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 5.211

5.  Predictive factors for successful pregnancy in an egg-sharing donation program.

Authors:  Daniela Paes de Almeida Ferreira Braga; Amanda Souza Setti; Assumpto Iaconelli; Edson Borges
Journal:  JBRA Assist Reprod       Date:  2020-05-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.