Literature DB >> 12477769

A prospective study of circulating mutant KRAS2 in the serum of patients with colorectal neoplasia: strong prognostic indicator in postoperative follow up.

B M Ryan1, F Lefort, R McManus, J Daly, P W N Keeling, D G Weir, D Kelleher.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Mutant tumour derived DNA has been detected in the sera of colorectal cancer patients. We investigated if mutant serum KRAS2 was detectable preoperatively in a large group of patients with colorectal neoplasia. A prospective study of 94 patients who underwent putative curative resection for colorectal carcinoma (CRC) was performed to ascertain if serum mutant KRAS2 could be used postoperatively as a disease marker.
METHODS: Preoperative sera from 78 patients were analysed (group A). Sera from 94 patients were obtained three monthly for up to three years during the postoperative period (group B). Codon 12 and 13 KRAS2 mutations were analysed in matched tumour and serum samples.
RESULTS: In the preoperative group (group A), KRAS2 mutation was found in 41/78 (53%) tumours and in 32/78 (41%) preoperative sera. Of 41 tumour KRAS2 mutation positive cases, 31/41 (76%) had an identical serum mutation detectable. In group B, the postoperative follow up group, 60/94 cases were primary tumour KRAS2 mutation positive. Of these 60, 16/60 (27%) became persistently serum mutant KRAS2 positive postoperatively. Ten of 16 (63%) of these developed a recurrence compared with only 1/44 (2%) patients who remained serum mutant negative (odds ratio 71.7 (95% confidence interval 7.7-663.9; p=0.0000). None of 34 tumour mutation negative cases became serum mutant KRAS2 positive postoperatively, despite recurrence in 9/34 patients. The relative hazard of disease recurrence in postoperative serum mutant KRAS2 positive patients was 6.37 (2.26-18.0; p=0.000).
CONCLUSIONS: Serum mutant KRAS2 can be detected preoperatively in all stages of colorectal neoplasia. Postoperatively, serum mutant KRAS2 is a strong predictor of disease recurrence, stronger even than Dukes' stage of disease, and thus shows potential for use in clinical practice as a marker of preclinical disease recurrence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12477769      PMCID: PMC1773535          DOI: 10.1136/gut.52.1.101

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gut        ISSN: 0017-5749            Impact factor:   23.059


  42 in total

1.  Cancer statistics, 1990.

Authors:  E Silverberg; C C Boring; T S Squires
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  1990 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 2.  A genetic model for colorectal tumorigenesis.

Authors:  E R Fearon; B Vogelstein
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1990-06-01       Impact factor: 41.582

3.  Telomerase RNA as a detection marker in the serum of breast cancer patients.

Authors:  X Q Chen; H Bonnefoi; M F Pelte; J Lyautey; C Lederrey; S Movarekhi; P Schaeffer; H E Mulcahy; P Meyer; M Stroun; P Anker
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  Somatic mutation screening: identification of individuals harboring K-ras mutations with the use of plasma DNA.

Authors:  M S Kopreski; F A Benko; D J Borys; A Khan; T J McGarrity; C D Gocke
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-06-07       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Microsatellite alterations and TP53 mutations in plasma DNA of small-cell lung cancer patients: follow-up study and prognostic significance.

Authors:  R Gonzalez; J M Silva; A Sanchez; G Dominguez; J M Garcia; X Q Chen; M Stroun; M Provencio; P España; P Anker; F Bonilla
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 32.976

6.  Identification of p53 gene mutations in bladder cancers and urine samples.

Authors:  D Sidransky; A Von Eschenbach; Y C Tsai; P Jones; I Summerhayes; F Marshall; M Paul; P Green; S R Hamilton; P Frost
Journal:  Science       Date:  1991-05-03       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Circulating RNA as a tumor marker: detection of 5T4 mRNA in breast and lung cancer patient serum.

Authors:  M S Kopreski; F A Benko; C D Gocke
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.691

8.  Analysis of DNA extracted from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues by enzymatic amplification and hybridization with sequence-specific oligonucleotides.

Authors:  C C Impraim; R K Saiki; H A Erlich; R L Teplitz
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  1987-02-13       Impact factor: 3.575

9.  Determination of circulating DNA levels in patients with benign or malignant gastrointestinal disease.

Authors:  B Shapiro; M Chakrabarty; E M Cohn; S A Leon
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1983-06-01       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  DNA in synovial fluid and the circulation of patients with arthritis.

Authors:  S A Leon; M Revach; G E Ehrlich; R Adler; V Petersen; B Shapiro
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1981-09
View more
  43 in total

1.  A rat virus visits the clinic: translating basic discoveries into clinical medicine in the 21st century.

Authors:  C R Boland; A Goel
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Circulating DNA Demonstrates Convergent Evolution and Common Resistance Mechanisms during Treatment of Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Alain R Thierry; Brice Pastor; Zhi-Qin Jiang; Anastasia D Katsiampoura; Christine Parseghian; Jonathan M Loree; Michael J Overman; Cynthia Sanchez; Safia El Messaoudi; Marc Ychou; Scott Kopetz
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 12.531

3.  Clinical validation of the detection of KRAS and BRAF mutations from circulating tumor DNA.

Authors:  Alain R Thierry; Florent Mouliere; Safia El Messaoudi; Caroline Mollevi; Evelyne Lopez-Crapez; Fanny Rolet; Brigitte Gillet; Celine Gongora; Pierre Dechelotte; Bruno Robert; Maguy Del Rio; Pierre-Jean Lamy; Frederic Bibeau; Michelle Nouaille; Virginie Loriot; Anne-Sophie Jarrousse; Franck Molina; Muriel Mathonnet; Denis Pezet; Marc Ychou
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2014-03-23       Impact factor: 53.440

Review 4.  Do circulating tumor cells, exosomes, and circulating tumor nucleic acids have clinical utility? A report of the association for molecular pathology.

Authors:  Bert Gold; Milena Cankovic; Larissa V Furtado; Frederick Meier; Christopher D Gocke
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 5.568

5.  DNA hybridization detection with 100 zM sensitivity using piezoelectric plate sensors with an improved noise-reduction algorithm.

Authors:  Ceyhun E Kirimli; Wei-Heng Shih; Wan Y Shih
Journal:  Analyst       Date:  2014-06-07       Impact factor: 4.616

Review 6.  Cell-free nucleic acids as biomarkers in cancer patients.

Authors:  Heidi Schwarzenbach; Dave S B Hoon; Klaus Pantel
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 60.716

7.  Comparison of KRAS/BRAF mutations between primary tumors and serum in colorectal cancer: Biological and clinical implications.

Authors:  Xingxiang Pu; Zhizhong Pan; Ying Huang; Ying Tian; Hongqiang Guo; Lin Wu; Xuexing He; Xinggui Chen; Shaodan Zhang; Tongyu Lin
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2012-10-10       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 8.  Perspectives for circulating tumor DNA in clinical management of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Ichiro Takemasa; Atsushi Hamabe; Masayuki Ishii
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 9.  Circulating and stool nucleic acid analysis for colorectal cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Giulia De Maio; Claudia Rengucci; Wainer Zoli; Daniele Calistri
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 10.  Alternatives for the intensive follow-up after curative resection of colorectal cancer. Potential novel biomarkers for the recommendations.

Authors:  Enikő Orosz; István Ember; Katalin Gombos; László Tóth; Ádám Tarpay; Ákos Pap; Szabolcs Ottó
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 3.201

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.