Literature DB >> 12477520

High rate of mixoploidy among human blastocysts cultured in vitro.

Magdalena Bielanska1, Seang Lin Tan, Asangla Ao.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence and type of mixoploidy in human blastocysts produced in vitro.
DESIGN: A laboratory study of spare blastocysts from an IVF program.
SETTING: University hospital laboratory. PATIENT(S): Thirty-nine couples undergoing IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm injection. INTERVENTION(S): A total of 103 blastocysts were classified as good- or poor-quality blastocysts based on morphology. A total of 6,927 interphase nuclei, 5,015 from 59 good-quality and 1,912 from 44 poor-quality blastocysts, were assessed for ploidy by fluorescence in situ hybridization with chromosome-specific DNA probes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The percentage and the type of polyploid cells present in each blastocyst. RESULT(S): Mixoploidy (mixture of diploid and polyploid cells) was found in 86% of good-quality and 82% of poor-quality blastocysts analyzed. The type of polyploidy ranged from 3N to 14N, with tetraploidy being the most common between both groups. The proportion of polyploid cells per mixoploid blastocyst ranged from 1% to 88%. The percentage of polyploid nuclei within most good-quality mixoploid blastocysts was small (10%) and significantly lower than in poor-quality blastocysts (19%). CONCLUSION(S): Most human blastocysts produced in vitro contain polyploid, predominantly tetraploid cells. The proportion of polyploid cells in the majority of good-quality blastocysts is low. The small numbers of blastocysts with a high percentage of polyploid cells may have implications for blastocyst transfer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12477520     DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(02)04393-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  16 in total

1.  The combination of calcium ionophore A23187 and GM-CSF can safely salvage aged human unfertilized oocytes after ICSI.

Authors:  Konstantinos A Economou; Dimitra Christopikou; Erika Tsorva; Stephen Davies; Minas Mastrominas; Haris Cazlaris; Michael Koutsilieris; Panagoula Angelogianni; Dimitris Loutradis
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-10-14       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Human embryonic stem cell lines isolation, cultivation, and characterization.

Authors:  Maria A Lagarkova; Artem V Eremeev; Anatoly V Svetlakov; Nikolay B Rubtsov; Sergei L Kiselev
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 2.416

3.  Metabolic and epigenetic dysfunctions underlie the arrest of in vitro fertilized human embryos in a senescent-like state.

Authors:  Yang Yang; Liyang Shi; Xiuling Fu; Gang Ma; Zhongzhou Yang; Yuhao Li; Yibin Zhou; Lihua Yuan; Ye Xia; Xiufang Zhong; Ping Yin; Li Sun; Wuwen Zhang; Isaac A Babarinde; Yongjun Wang; Xiaoyang Zhao; Andrew P Hutchins; Guoqing Tong
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 9.593

4.  Pre-implantation genetic testing: decisional factors to accept or decline among in vitro fertilization patients.

Authors:  Brandy Lamb; Erin Johnson; Leslie Francis; Melinda Fagan; Naomi Riches; Isabella Canada; Alena Wilson; Amber Mathiesen; Maya Sabatello; Shawn Gurtcheff; Erica Johnstone; Erin Rothwell
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Comprehensive analysis of karyotypic mosaicism between trophectoderm and inner cell mass.

Authors:  D S Johnson; C Cinnioglu; R Ross; A Filby; G Gemelos; M Hill; A Ryan; D Smotrich; M Rabinowitz; M J Murray
Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 4.025

6.  Morphokinetic parameters from a time-lapse monitoring system cannot accurately predict the ploidy of embryos.

Authors:  Jingye Zhang; Wenrong Tao; Hui Liu; Guanling Yu; Mei Li; Shuiying Ma; Keliang Wu
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-07-04       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 7.  New advances of preimplantation and prenatal genetic screening and noninvasive testing as a potential predictor of health status of babies.

Authors:  Tanya Milachich
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-03-24       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Preimplantation genetic screening: a practical guide.

Authors:  Paul R Brezina; Raymond W Ke; William H Kutteh
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Reprod Health       Date:  2013-02-27

Review 9.  International regulatory landscape and integration of corrective genome editing into in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  Motoko Araki; Tetsuya Ishii
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2014-11-24       Impact factor: 5.211

Review 10.  Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis: Prenatal Testing for Embryos Finally Achieving Its Potential.

Authors:  Harvey J Stern
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 4.241

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.