OBJECTIVES: We determined the prevalence and associated risk factors of hypertension in Hispanic elders, ages 60-92 years, living in Massachusetts. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: State of Massachusetts. SUBJECTS: A representative sample of 597 Hispanics of Caribbean origin (77% Puerto Ricans and 23% Dominicans) and 243 non-Hispanic Whites from the same neighborhoods. MEASURES: Blood pressure, income, health behaviors, chronic conditions, body mass index (BMI), and waist circumference. RESULTS: Hypertension was prevalent in all groups: 66% for Puerto Rican and 73% Dominican men, 69% for non-Hispanic White men; and 75%, 76%, and 74% for women in these groups, respectively. Twenty-one percent of Puerto Rican and 15% of Dominican women had systolic hypertension, compared to 9% for non-Hispanic White women (P < .01 anti P < .05, respectively). The prevalence of systolic hypertension was 14% and 21% for Puerto Rican and Dominican men, compared to 13% for non-Hispanic White men (not significant). Puerto Rican women with hypertension were less likely to have their blood pressure under control than were non-Hispanic While women. Puerto Rican and Dominican elders remained more than 2.6 times more likely to have systolic hypertension than non-Hispanic White elders after adjusting potential confounders. CONCLUSION: Hypertension is prevalent in this population and systolic hypertension is more prevalent among Hispanic vs non-Hispanic White elders. Investigation of genetic or other factors associated with this apparent excess risk of systolic hypertension among elderly Hispanics, particularly among women, is warranted.
OBJECTIVES: We determined the prevalence and associated risk factors of hypertension in Hispanic elders, ages 60-92 years, living in Massachusetts. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: State of Massachusetts. SUBJECTS: A representative sample of 597 Hispanics of Caribbean origin (77% Puerto Ricans and 23% Dominicans) and 243 non-Hispanic Whites from the same neighborhoods. MEASURES: Blood pressure, income, health behaviors, chronic conditions, body mass index (BMI), and waist circumference. RESULTS:Hypertension was prevalent in all groups: 66% for Puerto Rican and 73% Dominican men, 69% for non-Hispanic White men; and 75%, 76%, and 74% for women in these groups, respectively. Twenty-one percent of Puerto Rican and 15% of Dominican women had systolic hypertension, compared to 9% for non-Hispanic White women (P < .01 anti P < .05, respectively). The prevalence of systolic hypertension was 14% and 21% for Puerto Rican and Dominican men, compared to 13% for non-Hispanic White men (not significant). Puerto Rican women with hypertension were less likely to have their blood pressure under control than were non-Hispanic While women. Puerto Rican and Dominican elders remained more than 2.6 times more likely to have systolic hypertension than non-Hispanic White elders after adjusting potential confounders. CONCLUSION:Hypertension is prevalent in this population and systolic hypertension is more prevalent among Hispanic vs non-Hispanic White elders. Investigation of genetic or other factors associated with this apparent excess risk of systolic hypertension among elderly Hispanics, particularly among women, is warranted.
Authors: Josiemer Mattei; Serkalem Demissie; Luis M Falcon; Jose M Ordovas; Katherine Tucker Journal: Soc Sci Med Date: 2010-03-15 Impact factor: 4.634
Authors: Johanna Y Andrews-Chavez; Christina S Lee; Robert F Houser; Luis M Falcon; Katherine L Tucker Journal: Public Health Nutr Date: 2014-04-08 Impact factor: 4.022
Authors: Shilpa N Bhupathiraju; Alice H Lichtenstein; Bess Dawson-Hughes; Marian T Hannan; Katherine L Tucker Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2013-09-18 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Katherine L Tucker; Josiemer Mattei; Sabrina E Noel; Bridgette M Collado; Jackie Mendez; Jason Nelson; John Griffith; Jose M Ordovas; Luis M Falcon Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2010-03-01 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Christine L Rioux; Katherine L Tucker; Mkaya Mwamburi; David M Gute; Steven A Cohen; Doug Brugge Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2010-02-02 Impact factor: 9.031