Literature DB >> 12476979

Enhancement of IMRT delivery through MLC rotation.

Karl Otto1, Brenda G Clark.   

Abstract

Multileaf collimator (MLC) based intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) techniques are well established but suffer several physical limitations. Dosimetric spatial resolution is limited by the MLC leaf width; interleaf leakage and tongue-and-groove effects degrade dosimetric accuracy and the range of leaf motion limits the maximum deliverable field size. Collimator rotation is used in standard radiation therapy to improve the conformity of the MLC shape to the target volume. Except for opposed orthogonal fields, collimator rotation has not been exploited in IMRT due to the complexity of deriving the MLC leaf configurations for rotated sub-fields. Here we report on a new way that MLC-based IMRT is delivered which incorporates collimator rotation, providing an extra degree of freedom in deriving leaf sequences for a desired fluence map. Specifically, we have developed a series of unique algorithms that are capable of determining rotated MLC segments. These IMRT fields may be delivered statically (with the collimator rotating to a new position in between sub-fields) or dynamically (with the collimator rotating and leaves moving simultaneously during irradiation). This introductory study provides an analysis of the rotating leaf motion calculation algorithms with focus on radiation efficiency, the range of collimator rotation and number of segments. We then evaluate the technique by characterizing the ability of the algorithms to generate rotating leaf sequences for desired fluence maps. Comparisons are also made between our method and conventional sliding window and step-and-shoot techniques. Results show improvements in spatial resolution, reduced interleaf effects and maximum deliverable field size over conventional techniques. Clinical application of these enhancements can be realized immediately with static rotational delivery although improved dosimetric modelling of the MLC will be required for dynamic delivery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12476979     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/47/22/307

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  7 in total

Review 1.  Optical and x-ray technology synergies enabling diagnostic and therapeutic applications in medicine.

Authors:  Brian W Pogue; Brian C Wilson
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.170

2.  Performance evaluation of an algorithm for fast optimization of beam weights in anatomy-based intensity modulated radiotherapy.

Authors:  Vaitheeswaran Ranganathan; V K Sathiya Narayanan; Janhavi R Bhangle; Kamlesh K Gupta; Sumit Basu; Vikram Maiya; Jolly Joseph; Amit Nirhali
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2010-04

3.  The dosimetric impact of different photon beam energy on RapidArc radiotherapy planning for cervix carcinoma.

Authors:  Lalit Kumar; Girigesh Yadav; Kothanda Raman; Manindra Bhushan; Manoj Pal
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2015 Oct-Dec

4.  Variations in dosimetric distribution and plan complexity with collimator angles in hypofractionated volumetric arc radiotherapy for treating prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ming-Hsien Li; Sheng-Fang Huang; Chih-Chieh Chang; Jang-Chun Lin; Jo-Ting Tsai
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  Rounded leaf end modeling in Pinnacle VMAT treatment planning for fixed jaw linacs.

Authors:  Lori A Young; Fei Yang; Ning Cao; Juergen Meyer
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  A Method of High-Resolution Radiotherapy Delivery Fluences with a Pair of Fields with Orthogonal Collimator Settings: A Study on Ten Head-and-Neck Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Stipe Galić; Marin Kovačević; Ivan Lasić; Hrvoje Brkić; Dario Faj
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2020-03-13

7.  Compensators: an alternative IMRT delivery technique.

Authors:  Sha X Chang; Timothy J Cullip; Katharin M Deschesne; Elizabeth P Miller; Julian G Rosenman
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2004-07-01       Impact factor: 2.102

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.