Literature DB >> 12475665

Substratification of stage T1C prostate cancer based on the probability of biochemical recurrence.

Matthew B Gretzer1, Jonathan I Epstein, Charles R Pound, Patrick C Walsh, Alan W Partin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the influence of preoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA), biopsy Gleason sum, and prostate biopsy quantitative histologic findings on the probability of biochemical failure in an attempt to identify criteria to substratify Stage T1c prostate cancer more accurately.
METHODS: We reviewed the records of 1149 patients who underwent prostatectomy for T1c disease between 1988 and 2000. Biochemical recurrence (PSA 0.2 ng/mL or greater) defined the endpoint in this study. Recursive partitioning analysis was used to establish cutpoints for preoperative PSA level, biopsy Gleason sum, number of positive biopsy cores, and maximal percentage of any single biopsy core involved with cancer. These cutoff values were then evaluated using Kaplan-Meier estimations to determine the probability of remaining biochemically recurrence free.
RESULTS: Using a PSA cutpoint of 10 ng/mL or a biopsy Gleason sum of 7, two groups of patients were identified (T1cI and T1cII). The rate of freedom from PSA recurrence at 3, 5, and 10 years after surgery for T1cI was 98%, 96%, and 96%, respectively, and for T1cII was 86%, 83%, and 73%, respectively (P <0.001). For T1cII patients, the greatest percentage of cancer in a single biopsy core was found to be a predictor of biochemical failure on multivariate analysis and, using a cutoff value of 50%, further stratified the PSA recurrence-free rates for the men in group T1cII (90% and 85% versus 75% and 56% at 5 and 10 years after surgery, respectively, P = 0.03).
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study demonstrate that within Stage T1c there are two populations of patients with significantly different recurrence probabilities: T1cI (Gleason sum less than 7 and PSA 10 ng/mL or less) and T1cII (Gleason sum 7 or greater or PSA greater than 10 ng/mL). Furthermore, using a cutpoint of 50% of cancer in a single core of biopsy tissue, additional risk stratification is afforded to men with higher risk "T1cII" cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12475665     DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(02)01997-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  7 in total

1.  Advances in prostate cancer treatment: highlights from the 2nd international prostate cancer congress, st. Thomas, u.s. Virgin islands, july 17-20, 2002.

Authors:  Matthew B Gretzer; Alan W Partin
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2003

2.  Measurements of cancer extent in a conservatively treated prostate cancer biopsy cohort.

Authors:  Ramzi Rajab; Gabrielle Fisher; Michael W Kattan; Christopher S Foster; Tim Oliver; Henrik Møller; Victor Reuter; Peter Scardino; Jack Cuzick; Daniel M Berney
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2010-09-09       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 3.  Early versus delayed hormonal treatment in locally advanced or asymptomatic metastatic prostatic cancer patient dilemma.

Authors:  Domenico Prezioso; Fabrizio Iacono; Giuseppe Romeo; Antonio Ruffo; Nicola Russo; Ester Illiano
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-08-08       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Prognostic factors for failure after prostatectomy.

Authors:  Gregory P Swanson; Joseph W Basler
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 4.207

5.  Long-term outcomes of nonpalpable prostate cancer (T1c) patients treated with radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Yoshiyasu Amiya; Makoto Sasaki; Takayuki Shima; Yuusuke Tomiyama; Noriyuki Suzuki; Shino Murakami; Hiroomi Nakatsu; Jun Shimazaki
Journal:  Prostate Int       Date:  2015-02-10

6.  Positive resection margins may not reflect the true margin in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Nobuki Furubayashi; Takahito Negishi; Yu Hirata; Kenichi Taguchi; Mototsugu Shimokawa; Motonobu Nakamura
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 2.967

7.  Biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy in intermediate-risk group men increases with the number of risk factors.

Authors:  Nobuki Furubayashi; Takahito Negishi; Hidenori Iwai; Kei Nagase; Kenichi Taguchi; Mototsugu Shimokawa; Motonobu Nakamura
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2017 Jan-Mar
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.