Literature DB >> 12475095

Intracardiac Doppler echocardiographic quantification of pulmonary vein flow velocity: an effective technique for monitoring pulmonary vein ostia narrowing during focal atrial fibrillation ablation.

Jian-Fang Ren1, Francis E Marchlinski, David J Callans, Erica S Zado.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Ablation at the pulmonary vein (PV) ostium to isolate triggers for atrial fibrillation (AF) may induce PV narrowing. The AcuNav ultrasound catheter can image PV flow and quantify peak velocity and may be useful in assessing the degree of narrowing of PV ostia. METHODS AND
RESULTS: In 93 patients with AF undergoing PV ostial ablation (up to 40 W, 52 degrees C, 90 sec), the ultrasound catheter was placed in the right atrium and PV peak flow velocities were measured during systole and diastole before and after ablation. Ostial PV electrical isolation was achieved in 216 of the 219 targeted PVs. The ultrasound catheter provided flow imaging of all PVs. The ostial peak flow velocities measured 56 +/- 12 cm/sec before ablation and increased to 101 +/- 22 cm/sec after ablation (P < 0.001). Peak velocity >100 cm/sec was detected in 103 (47%) of 219 and > or = 158 cm/sec (estimated pressure gradient 10 mmHg) with turbulent flow features, in 7 (3.2%) of 219 PVs. The highest velocity detected in one PV was 211 cm/sec (17.7 mmHg). Follow-up ultrasound catheter measurements were obtained in 13 patients (30 previously ablated PVs) during repeat ablations. The ostial peak velocity had decreased by 22 +/- 14 cm/sec and in 25 (83%) of 30 PVs was within the baseline range (<100 cm/sec) at a mean follow-up of 4.9 +/- 2.2 months. Follow-up magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or contrast-enhanced CT was obtained at 7.0 +/- 3.8 months in seven patients with PV velocity > 158 cm/sec after initial ablation. No significant stenosis (<30%) was identified, and no patient suffered clinical symptoms (follow-up 6-18 months) related to the described acute changes in PV flow after an initial ablation procedure. Of 13 patients with repeat ablation, two had PV velocities >100 cm/sec before repeat ablation, and three PVs in two patients had flow velocity >158 cm/sec after repeat ablation. One of these patients developed symptoms of exertional dyspnea; MRI at 4 months showed 50% to 60% ostial narrowing.
CONCLUSION: Ostial ablation for PV isolation may induce a mild-to-moderate increase in PV flow velocity, which can be identified using an ultrasound catheter with Doppler color flow imaging. Increases in PV flow velocity (<158 cm/sec) after a primary ablation procedure appear to be well tolerated, and a return toward baseline flow characteristics should be anticipated by 3 months. A more cautious approach may be required for patients undergoing repeat PV isolation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12475095     DOI: 10.1046/j.1540-8167.2002.01076.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1045-3873


  16 in total

1.  Sixteen-row multislice computed tomography in the assessment of pulmonary veins prior to ablative treatment: validation vs conventional pulmonary venography and study of reproducibility.

Authors:  Ruzica Maksimović; Filippo Cademartiri; Marcoen Scholten; Luc J Jordaens; Peter M T Pattynama
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-11-14       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Use of imaging techniques to guide catheter ablation procedures.

Authors:  Melissa R Robinson; Mathew D Hutchinson
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 3.  Pulmonary vein stenosis: Etiology, diagnosis and management.

Authors:  Pablo Pazos-López; Cristina García-Rodríguez; Alba Guitián-González; Emilio Paredes-Galán; María Ángel De La Guarda Álvarez-Moure; Marta Rodríguez-Álvarez; José Antonio Baz-Alonso; Elvis Teijeira-Fernández; Francisco Eugenio Calvo-Iglesias; Andrés Íñiguez-Romo
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2016-01-26

4.  Assessment of pulmonary venous stenosis after radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation by magnetic resonance angiography: A comparison of linear and cross-sectional area measurements.

Authors:  Jaroslav Tintera; Václav Porod; Robert Cihák; Hanka Mlcochová; Eva Rolencová; Pavel Fendrych; Josef Kautzner
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-08-08       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  Intracardiac echocardiography in electrophysiology.

Authors:  J Kautzner; P Peichl
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2007-09

Review 6.  Is Isolation of Arrhythmogenic Pulmonary Veins Sufficient for the Long-term Efficacy of Atrial Fibrillation Ablation?

Authors:  Sanjay Dixit
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2010-06-01

7.  Beat to beat 3-dimensional intracardiac echocardiography: theoretical approach and practical experiences.

Authors:  Daniel Stapf; Andreas Franke; Marcus Schreckenberg; Georg Schummers; Karl Mischke; Nikolaus Marx; Patrick Schauerte; Christian Knackstedt
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-10-14       Impact factor: 2.357

8.  Complications from catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: impact of current and emerging ablation technologies.

Authors:  Nikhil C Panda; Jim W Cheung
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2014-10

Review 9.  The Role of Intracardiac Echocardiography in Atrial Fibrillation Ablation.

Authors:  Elad Anter; Mathew D Hutchinson; David J Callans
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2009-10-01

10.  Effect of heart rate and isoproterenol on pulmonary vein flow velocity following radiofrequency ablation: a Doppler color flow imaging study.

Authors:  Jian-Fang Ren; Francis E Marchlinski; David J Callans
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.900

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.