Literature DB >> 12474921

Posterior capsule opacification and Nd:YAG capsulotomy rates after implantation of silicone, hydrogel and soft acrylic intraocular lenses: a two-year follow-up study.

G Beltrame1, M L Salvetat, M Chizzolini, G B Driussi, P Busatto, G Di Giorgio, F Barosco.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the posterior capsule opacification (PCO) and neodymium:YAG (Nd:YAG) laser posterior capsulotomy rates associated with three different posterior chamber foldable intraocular lenses (IOL).
METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the rates of PCO and Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy in 1150 eyes two years after standard phacoemulsification with a no-stitch 3.5mm clear corneal incision (CCI) and in-the-bag implantation of one of three types of IOL: 190 eyes received a one-piece round-edged hydrogel IOL (Hydroview H60M, Bausch & Lomb); 475 eyes a three-piece round-edged silicone IOL (AMO PhacoFlex SI-40NB, Allergan); 485 eyes a three-piece square-edged soft acrylic lens (AcrySof MA60MA, Alcon).
RESULTS: The PCO and Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy rates were respectively 43.15% and 20.5% in the Hydroview H60M group, 27.57% and 9.68% in the AMO PhacoFlex SI-40NB group, 10.5% and 2.47% in the AcrySof MA60MA group.
CONCLUSIONS: PCO and Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy rates were significantly higher in the Hydroview H60M group and significantly lower with the AcrySof MA60MA lenses, which combine a bioactive constitutive material with the square-edged optic design.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12474921     DOI: 10.1177/112067210201200508

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 1120-6721            Impact factor:   2.597


  7 in total

1.  Nd:YAG capsulotomy rates after use of the AcrySof acrylic three piece and one piece intraocular lenses.

Authors:  S I Mian; K Fahim; A Marcovitch; H Gada; D C Musch; A Sugar
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 2.  Intraocular lens optic edge design for the prevention of posterior capsule opacification after cataract surgery.

Authors:  Sophie Maedel; Jennifer R Evans; Annette Harrer-Seely; Oliver Findl
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-08-16

3.  Comparison of posterior capsular opacification in heparin-surface-modified hydrophilic acrylic and hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses.

Authors:  Seungbum Kang; Jin A Choi; Choun-Ki Joo
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-05-31       Impact factor: 2.447

4.  Long-term results of trypan blue dye irrigation in the capsular bag to prevent posterior capsule opacification: A randomized trial.

Authors:  Rajesh Subhash Joshi; Murtaza Saifuddin Hussain
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.848

5.  Effect of hydrophobic acrylic versus hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lens on posterior capsule opacification: meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ying Li; Jiaxing Wang; Zhuo Chen; Xin Tang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Long-term effectiveness and safety of a three-piece acrylic hydrophobic intraocular lens modified with hydroxyethyl-methacrylate: an open-label, 3-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Andrew Maxwell; Rajaraman Suryakumar
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-10-11

7.  A meta-analysis of Nd:YAG capsulotomy rates for two hydrophobic intraocular lens materials.

Authors:  Mark Von Tress; James S Marotta; Stephen S Lane; Ramesh Sarangapani
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-06-22
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.