Literature DB >> 12474191

Prospective payment, prospective challenge.

Margaret G Stineman1.   

Abstract

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services has implemented an inpatient rehabilitation facility prospective payment system (IRF-PPS) based on case-mix groups (CMGs). The CMGs, now almost identical in structure to the Functional Independence Measure-Function-Related Groups (FIM-FRGs), will measure patients' functional severity by the FIM trade mark instrument, rather than by the Minimum Data Set for Post-Acute Care, as was initially planned. Although this late change in plans is a major triumph for physical medicine and rehabilitation and for the patients we serve, economic incentives inherent in the IRF-PPS may still transform inpatient rehabilitation as it is currently practiced in the United States. This commentary compares the CMGs with the FIM-FRGs; addresses the implications of the CMGs' implementation for patients, researchers, and clinicians; and highlights ways of adapting previous FIM-FRG applications and research to help meet the challenges presented by the new IRF-PPS. Copyright 2002 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12474191     DOI: 10.1053/apmr.2002.36067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  8 in total

1.  The effect of prospective payment on admission and treatment policy: evidence from inpatient rehabilitation facilities.

Authors:  Neeraj Sood; Peter J Huckfeldt; David C Grabowski; Joseph P Newhouse; José J Escarce
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  Effects of payment changes on trends in post-acute care.

Authors:  Melinda Beeuwkes Buntin; Carrie Hoverman Colla; José J Escarce
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-04-05       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  State regulation and the delivery of physical therapy services.

Authors:  Linda Resnik; Zhanlian Feng; Dennis L Hart
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Representativeness of the Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems National Database.

Authors:  John D Corrigan; Jeffrey P Cuthbert; Gale G Whiteneck; Marcel P Dijkers; Victor Coronado; Allen W Heinemann; Cynthia Harrison-Felix; James E Graham
Journal:  J Head Trauma Rehabil       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.710

5.  Change in inpatient rehabilitation admissions for individuals with traumatic brain injury after implementation of the Medicare inpatient rehabilitation facility prospective payment system.

Authors:  Jeanne M Hoffman; Elena Donoso Brown; Leighton Chan; Sureyya Dikmen; Nancy Temkin; Kathleen R Bell
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.966

6.  Rehospitalization During 9 Months After Inpatient Rehabilitation for Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Flora M Hammond; Susan D Horn; Randall J Smout; Ronald T Seel; Cynthia L Beaulieu; John D Corrigan; Ryan S Barrett; Nora Cullen; Teri Sommerfeld; Murray E Brandstater
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.966

7.  Representativeness of the Spinal Cord Injury Model Systems National Database.

Authors:  Jessica M Ketchum; Jeffrey P Cuthbert; Anne Deutsch; Yuying Chen; Susan Charlifue; David Chen; Marcel P Dijkers; James E Graham; Allen W Heinemann; Daniel P Lammertse; Gale G Whiteneck
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2017-11-06       Impact factor: 2.772

8.  Extension of the representativeness of the Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems National Database: 2001 to 2010.

Authors:  Jeffrey P Cuthbert; John D Corrigan; Gale G Whiteneck; Cynthia Harrison-Felix; James E Graham; Jeneita M Bell; Victor G Coronado
Journal:  J Head Trauma Rehabil       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.710

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.