Literature DB >> 12469856

Nitrogen and phosphorus availability in composted and uncomposted poultry litter.

P L Preusch1, P R Adler, L J Sikora, T J Tworkoski.   

Abstract

Poultry litter applications to land have been based on crop N requirements, resulting in application of P in excess of plant requirements, which may cause degradation of water quality in the Chesapeake Bay watershed. The effect of litter source (the Delmarva Peninsula and Moorefield, West Virginia) and composting of poultry litter on N mineralization and availability of P in two soil types (sandy loam and silt loam) was determined in a controlled environment for 120 d. Nitrogen mineralization (percent total organic N converted to inorganic nitrogen) rates were higher for fresh litter (range of 42 to 64%) than composted litter (range of 1 to 9%). The N mineralization rate of fresh litter from the Delmarva Peninsula was consistently lower than the fresh litter from Moorefield, WV. The N mineralization rate of composted litter from either source was not significantly different for each soil type (7 to 9% in sandy loam and 1 to 5% in silt loam) even though composting conditions were completely different at the two composting facilities. Litter source had a large effect on N mineralization rates of fresh but not composted poultry litter. Composting yielded a more predictable and reliable source of mineralizable N than fresh litter. Water-extractable phosphorus (WEP) was similar in soils amended with composted litter from WV and fresh litter from both sources (approximately 10 to 25 and 2 to 14 mg P kg(-1) for sandy loam and silt loam, respectively). Mehlich 1-extractable phosphorus (MEP) was similar in soils amended with WV fresh litter and composted litter from both sources (approximately 100 to 140 and 60 to 90 mg P kg(-1) for sandy loam and silt loam, respectively). These results suggest that the composting process did not consistently reduce WEP and MEP, and P can be as available in composted poultry litter as in fresh poultry litter.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12469856     DOI: 10.2134/jeq2002.2051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Qual        ISSN: 0047-2425            Impact factor:   2.751


  2 in total

1.  Factors influencing chemical quality of composted poultry waste.

Authors:  Michał Kopeć; Krzysztof Gondek; Monika Mierzwa-Hersztek; Jacek Antonkiewicz
Journal:  Saudi J Biol Sci       Date:  2016-09-12       Impact factor: 4.219

2.  Mineral biofortification of vegetables through soil-applied poultry mortality compost.

Authors:  Muhammad Umair Mubarak; Aysha Kiran; Ahmad Naeem Shahzad; Muhammad Farooq Qayyum; Muhammad Ishfaq; Khalid Mahmood; Abdul Wakeel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 3.752

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.