Literature DB >> 12466220

Columns for complex visual object features in the inferotemporal cortex: clustering of cells with similar but slightly different stimulus selectivities.

Keiji Tanaka1.   

Abstract

Cells in the inferotemporal cortex (area TE) selectively respond to complex visual object features and those that respond to similar features cluster in a columnar region elongated vertical to the cortical surface. What are the functional roles of the column structure in the inferotemporal cortex? Selectivity of cells within a column is similar but not identical. If we emphasize the similarity among cells within a column, we can regard the columns as units for description of object features. The variety of stimulus selectivity in a column may work as a tool to disregard subtle changes in input images when the system is directed to invariant recognition. Alternatively, if we emphasize the differences in selectivity of cells within a column, the columns can be compared to differential amplifiers, each of which represents variety within a group of features. The enormous number of objects present in nature can be efficiently described by combining outputs of the multiple differential amplifiers in the inferotemporal cortex. The two modes may work in parallel, with a graded balance changing according to the behavioral context. Determining whether or not these hypotheses are valid will require further studies.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12466220     DOI: 10.1093/cercor/13.1.90

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cereb Cortex        ISSN: 1047-3211            Impact factor:   5.357


  73 in total

1.  Neural substrates differentiating global/local processing of bilateral visual inputs.

Authors:  Shihui Han; Yi Jiang; Hua Gu
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 2.  Some thoughts on cortical minicolumns.

Authors:  Kathleen S Rockland; Noritaka Ichinohe
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-07-28       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Multimap formation in visual cortex.

Authors:  Rishabh Jain; Rachel Millin; Bartlett W Mel
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Functional connectivity in fMRI: A modeling approach for estimation and for relating to local circuits.

Authors:  Ransom Winder; Carlos R Cortes; James A Reggia; M-A Tagamets
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-11-28       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  A stable topography of selectivity for unfamiliar shape classes in monkey inferior temporal cortex.

Authors:  Hans P Op de Beeck; Jennifer A Deutsch; Wim Vanduffel; Nancy G Kanwisher; James J DiCarlo
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2007-11-21       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 6.  Interpreting fMRI data: maps, modules and dimensions.

Authors:  Hans P Op de Beeck; Johannes Haushofer; Nancy G Kanwisher
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 34.870

7.  Object representations in the temporal cortex of monkeys and humans as revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Andrew H Bell; Fadila Hadj-Bouziane; Jennifer B Frihauf; Roger B H Tootell; Leslie G Ungerleider
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Surprising twist on auditory representation. Focus on: "what's that sound? Auditory area CLM encodes stimulus surprise, not intensity or intensity changes".

Authors:  Timothy Q Gentner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 9.  Flexible cognitive resources: competitive content maps for attention and memory.

Authors:  Steven L Franconeri; George A Alvarez; Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 20.229

10.  Visual field biases for near and far stimuli in disparity selective columns in human visual cortex.

Authors:  Shahin Nasr; Roger B H Tootell
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-09-10       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.