Literature DB >> 12464959

The distribution of individual threshold doses eliciting allergic reactions in a population with peanut allergy.

Marjolein Wensing1, André H Penninks, Susan L Hefle, Stef J Koppelman, Carla A F M Bruijnzeel-Koomen, André C Knulst.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hidden peanut in consumer products can endanger patients with peanut allergy. Individual threshold doses for eliciting allergic reactions need to be elucidated to assess the risks for development of allergic reactions after accidental ingestion of peanut in a population with peanut allergy.
OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the distribution of individual threshold doses in a population with peanut allergy and to correlate these thresholds to the severity of peanut-induced symptoms.
METHODS: Twenty-six adult patients with a convincing history of peanut-related symptoms, a specific IgE level of 0.7 kU/L or greater, or a positive skin prick test response of 2+ or greater to peanut were included. These patients underwent double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenges with increasing doses of peanut. A threshold dose could be established when objective or repetitive subjective reactions occurred after active doses.
RESULTS: All patients had subjective oral symptoms (n = 26), prior subjective gastrointestinal symptoms (n = 14), or objective symptoms (n = 5). Reactions started within 30 minutes after ingestion of peanut, but in 2 patients additional symptoms were delayed by 1 to 2 hours. Threshold doses for allergic reactions ranged from a dose as low as 100 microg up to 1 g of peanut protein. Fifty percent of the study population (95% CI, 30%-70%) already had an allergic reaction after ingestion of 3 mg of peanut protein. Patients with severe symptoms had lower threshold doses compared with those of patients with mild symptoms (P =.027).
CONCLUSIONS: A substantial part of a population with peanut allergy will react to very low amounts of peanut, requiring accurate declaration of peanut content in consumer products. This is even more important because patients with severe reactions react to lower doses than patients with mild symptoms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12464959     DOI: 10.1067/mai.2002.129235

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol        ISSN: 0091-6749            Impact factor:   10.793


  18 in total

1.  Oral rush desensitization in peanut allergy: a case report.

Authors:  Giampiero Patriarca; Eleonora Nucera; Emanuela Pollastrini; Tiziana De Pasquale; Carla Lombardo; Alessandro Buonomo; Chiara Roncallo; Valentina Pecora; Sonia Musumeci; Giorgia Altomonte; Cristiana Alonzi; Domenico Schiavino; Giovanni Gasbarrini
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Structure and stability of 2S albumin-type peanut allergens: implications for the severity of peanut allergic reactions.

Authors:  Katrin Lehmann; Kristian Schweimer; Gerald Reese; Stefanie Randow; Martin Suhr; Wolf-Meinhard Becker; Stefan Vieths; Paul Rösch
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2006-05-01       Impact factor: 3.857

3.  Smartphone instrument for portable enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays.

Authors:  Kenneth D Long; Hojeong Yu; Brian T Cunningham
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 3.732

Review 4.  Childcare and School Management Issues in Food Allergy.

Authors:  Angela Tsuang; Julie Wang
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 4.806

Review 5.  Recognition and management of food-induced anaphylaxis.

Authors:  Corinne Keet
Journal:  Pediatr Clin North Am       Date:  2011-03-05       Impact factor: 3.278

6.  Ara h 2: crystal structure and IgE binding distinguish two subpopulations of peanut allergic patients by epitope diversity.

Authors:  G A Mueller; R A Gosavi; A Pomés; S Wünschmann; A F Moon; R E London; L C Pedersen
Journal:  Allergy       Date:  2011-01-21       Impact factor: 13.146

Review 7.  Fatal anaphylaxis to foods: epidemiology, recognition, and prevention.

Authors:  Dan Atkins; S Allan Bock
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 4.806

8.  Identification of Maillard reaction products on peanut allergens that influence binding to the receptor for advanced glycation end products.

Authors:  G A Mueller; S J Maleki; K Johnson; B K Hurlburt; H Cheng; S Ruan; J B Nesbit; A Pomés; L L Edwards; A Schorzman; L J Deterding; H Park; K B Tomer; R E London; J G Williams
Journal:  Allergy       Date:  2013-11-23       Impact factor: 13.146

Review 9.  Common methodologies in the evaluation of food allergy: pitfalls and prospects of food allergy prevalence studies.

Authors:  Shang-an Shu; Christopher Chang; Patrick S C Leung
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 8.667

10.  Use of Specific IgE and Skin Prick Test to Determine Clinical Reaction Severity.

Authors:  Von Ta; Brittany Weldon; Grace Yu; Olivier Humblet; Susan Neale-May; Kari Nadeau
Journal:  Br J Med Med Res       Date:  2011
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.