Literature DB >> 12464918

Comparison of simultaneous invasive and noninvasive measurements of pressure gradients in congenital aortic valve stenosis.

Piers C A Barker1, Gregory Ensing, Achiau Ludomirsky, David J Bradley, Thomas R Lloyd, Albert P Rocchini.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Congenital aortic valve stenosis is a common problem in pediatric cardiology. The catheter peak to peak systolic gradient is the accepted standard used for prognosis and intervention, but noninvasive correlation in pediatric patients is frequently associated with underestimation or overestimation of this gradient. The purpose of this study was to compare different noninvasive measurements with simultaneous catheter gradients to identify which best predicts the catheter peak to peak gradient.
METHODS: Twenty-five simultaneous Doppler and catheter measurements of aortic stenosis gradient were performed in 14 children (all 14 before valvuloplasty and 11 after valvuloplasty). Noninvasive estimates of pressure gradient were compared with catheter measurements with linear regression and Bland-Altman analysis.
RESULTS: The Doppler peak instantaneous pressure gradient overestimated the catheter peak to peak gradient but correlated well with the catheter peak instantaneous gradient. The Doppler mean systolic gradient correlated well with the catheter peak to peak gradient at low gradients and underestimated higher catheter gradients but agreed well at all levels with the catheter mean gradient. The modification of a catheter-derived correlation equation produced good correlation with the catheter peak to peak gradient (slope, 1.14; intercept, -1.8; R, 0.92), as did the use of estimated pressure recovery (slope, 1.04; intercept, 5.0; R, 0.94), calculated from a defined fluid mechanic equation.
CONCLUSION: The catheter peak to peak gradient can be accurately estimated noninvasively using estimated pressure recovery or correlation equations incorporating Doppler measurements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12464918     DOI: 10.1067/mje.2002.126415

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr        ISSN: 0894-7317            Impact factor:   5.251


  5 in total

1.  Echocardiographic follow-up of congenital aortic valvular stenosis.

Authors:  Ayse Guler Eroglu; Kadir Babaoglu; Leven Saltik; Funda Oztunç; Tevfik Demir; Gulay Ahunbay; Alper Guzeltas; Gürkan Cetin
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2006-11-16       Impact factor: 1.655

2.  Echocardiographic Follow-Up of Congenital Aortic Valvular Stenosis II.

Authors:  Ayşe Güler Eroğlu; Sezen Ugan Atik; Betül Çinar; Murat Tuğberk Bakar; İrfan Levent Saltik
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 1.655

3.  Comparison of invasive and non-invasive pressure gradients in aortic arch obstruction.

Authors:  Bethany L Wisotzkey; Christoph P Hornik; Amanda S Green; Piers C A Barker
Journal:  Cardiol Young       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 1.093

4.  Discrepancies between Doppler and catheter gradients in ventricular septal defect: a correction of localized gradients from pressure recovery phenomenon.

Authors:  Taylan Akgun; Can Yücel Karabay; Gonenc Kocabay; Vecih Oduncu; Arzu Kalayci; Ahmet Guler; Olcay Ozveren; Fatih Yilmaz; Mustafa Akcakoyun; Cevat Kirma
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-09-14       Impact factor: 2.357

5.  Clinical utility of Doppler echocardiography in assessing aortic stenosis severity and predicting need for intervention in children.

Authors:  Antonios P Vlahos; Gerald R Marx; Doff McElhinney; Stephen Oneill; Ioannis Goudevenos; Steven D Colan
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2007-12-14       Impact factor: 1.655

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.