Tom Pickles1, Norm Phillips. 1. Radiation Oncology Program, British Columbia Cancer Agency, 600 West 10th Avenue, Vancouver V5Z 4E6, BC, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To describe the risk of second malignancy following a diagnosis of prostate cancer, in British Columbia (BC), Canada. To ascertain whether that risk changed with the use of radiation therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: All invasive cases of prostate cancer diagnosed from 1984 through to 2000 were retrieved from the BC Tumor Registry. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) were calculated from observed and expected numbers as a percentage. Patients were divided into those who received high-dose radiation therapy (>/=45 Gy, RT group) and those not treated with radiation (non-RT group). RESULTS: Overall there was no significant difference between observed and expected second cancer rates, SIR=100 (RT group, N=101; non-RT group, N=98, P=n.s.). Individual tumour sites at significantly increased risk (P<0.01) included bladder (non-RT group, SIR=132), colo-rectal (RT group, SIR=121), pleura (RT group, SIR=228). Other sites of possible significance (P<0.05) include sarcoma (RT group, SIR=170) and testis (non-RT group, SIR=282). CONCLUSIONS: Increased rates of bladder and testis cancers in the non-RT group are likely to be due to increased urologist surveillance and the use of therapeutic orchiectomy. Increased rates of colorectal cancer in those treated with radiation may be either due to surveillance or treatment. Increases in sarcomas in the RT group are probably treatment-related. Overall the increased second cancer risk for those undergoing radiation therapy was 1 in 220.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To describe the risk of second malignancy following a diagnosis of prostate cancer, in British Columbia (BC), Canada. To ascertain whether that risk changed with the use of radiation therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: All invasive cases of prostate cancer diagnosed from 1984 through to 2000 were retrieved from the BC Tumor Registry. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) were calculated from observed and expected numbers as a percentage. Patients were divided into those who received high-dose radiation therapy (>/=45 Gy, RT group) and those not treated with radiation (non-RT group). RESULTS: Overall there was no significant difference between observed and expected second cancer rates, SIR=100 (RT group, N=101; non-RT group, N=98, P=n.s.). Individual tumour sites at significantly increased risk (P<0.01) included bladder (non-RT group, SIR=132), colo-rectal (RT group, SIR=121), pleura (RT group, SIR=228). Other sites of possible significance (P<0.05) include sarcoma (RT group, SIR=170) and testis (non-RT group, SIR=282). CONCLUSIONS: Increased rates of bladder and testis cancers in the non-RT group are likely to be due to increased urologist surveillance and the use of therapeutic orchiectomy. Increased rates of colorectal cancer in those treated with radiation may be either due to surveillance or treatment. Increases in sarcomas in the RT group are probably treatment-related. Overall the increased second cancer risk for those undergoing radiation therapy was 1 in 220.
Authors: Dragan J Golijanin; David Kakiashvili; Ralph R Madeb; Edward M Messing; Seth P Lerner Journal: World J Urol Date: 2006-11 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Lois B Travis; Andrea K Ng; James M Allan; Ching-Hon Pui; Ann R Kennedy; X George Xu; James A Purdy; Kimberly Applegate; Joachim Yahalom; Louis S Constine; Ethel S Gilbert; John D Boice Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2012-02-06 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: David S Yee; Shahrokh F Shariat; William T Lowrance; Joseph R Sterbis; Kinjal C Vora; Bernard H Bochner; S Machele Donat; Harry W Herr; Guido Dalbagni; Jaspreet S Sandhu Journal: J Urol Date: 2010-03-17 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Tracy L Klayton; Karen Ruth; Eric M Horwitz; Robert G Uzzo; Alexander Kutikov; David Y T Chen; Mark Sobczak; Mark K Buyyounouski Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2011-08-31 Impact factor: 6.280