Literature DB >> 12464340

Scalp-recorded Bereitschaftspotential is the result of the activity of cortical and subcortical generators--a hypothesis.

Ivan Rektor1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The source of scalp-recorded Bereitschaftspotential (BP) remains a subject of ongoing discussion. This paper presents arguments in favour of the hypothesis that explains scalp-recorded BP as the result of the activity of both cortical and subcortical BP generators.
METHODS: Intracranial recordings of BP were performed, mostly with depth electrodes in epilepsy surgery candidates. In some patients undergoing intracranial exploration, an electrode may have had contacts in the subcortical structures.
RESULTS: BP is generated in several cortical and subcortical structures that are known to be directly or indirectly linked with motor control. Cortical sources of BP were displayed contralaterally to the movement in the primary motor cortex and somatosensory cortex, and bilaterally in the supplementary motor area (SMA), in the preSMA, and in the cingulate. A few other generators may be revealed in structures that have not yet been sufficiently explored. Subcortical generators of BP were found in the putamen, pallidum, caudate, and in the thalamus. In earlier recordings, BP was described rostrally to the thalamic region and in the brainstem, i.e. in the pes peripedunculi, nucleus peripeduncularis, pulvinar, and medial geniculate.
CONCLUSIONS: Our observations do not explain the generation of scalp-recorded BP by the contribution of either cortical or subcortical sources alone. Intracranial cortical recordings contradict a wide distribution of scalp-recorded BP. Widely synchronised cerebral electromagnetic activity can be recorded on the scalp. We presume that in the case of BP, the weak deep dipoles might reach the scalp, as they are produced by a relatively huge mass of subcortical neuronal tissue. We strongly suspect that scalp-recorded BP represents a summation of potentials that are generated simultaneously in several cortical as well as in several subcortical structures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12464340     DOI: 10.1016/s1388-2457(02)00286-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 1388-2457            Impact factor:   3.708


  14 in total

1.  Cognitive potentials in the basal ganglia-frontocortical circuits. An intracerebral recording study.

Authors:  Ivan Rektor; Martin Bares; Petr Kanovský; Milan Brázdil; Irena Klajblová; Hana Streitová; Irena Rektorová; Daniela Sochůrková; Dagmar Kubová; Robert Kuba; Pavel Daniel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-06-22       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Neural correlates of heat-evoked pain memory in humans.

Authors:  Liping Wang; Peng Gui; Lei Li; Yixuan Ku; Mark Bodner; Gaojie Fan; Yong-Di Zhou; Xiao-Wei Dong
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Electroencephalographic evidence for pre-motor cortex activation during inspiratory loading in humans.

Authors:  Mathieu Raux; Christian Straus; Stefania Redolfi; Capucine Morelot-Panzini; Antoine Couturier; François Hug; Thomas Similowski
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2006-11-16       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  The effect of temporal accuracy constraints on movement-related potentials.

Authors:  Rongqing Cui; Colum D MacKinnon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-02-17       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Age-related changes in orienting attention in time.

Authors:  Theodore P Zanto; Peter Pan; Helen Liu; Jacob Bollinger; Anna C Nobre; Adam Gazzaley
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Event-related potential activity in the basal ganglia differentiates rewards from nonrewards: temporospatial principal components analysis and source localization of the feedback negativity.

Authors:  Dan Foti; Anna Weinberg; Joseph Dien; Greg Hajcak
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-02-08       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Event-related potential activity in the basal ganglia differentiates rewards from nonrewards: response to commentary.

Authors:  Dan Foti; Anna Weinberg; Joseph Dien; Greg Hajcak
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Involvement of the human pedunculopontine nucleus region in voluntary movements.

Authors:  E W Tsang; C Hamani; E Moro; F Mazzella; Y Y Poon; A M Lozano; R Chen
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 9.910

9.  Intentional inhibition: how the "veto-area" exerts control.

Authors:  Simone Kühn; Patrick Haggard; Marcel Brass
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  Electrophysiological manifestations of stimulus evaluation, response inhibition and motor processing in Tourette syndrome patients.

Authors:  Genevieve Thibault; Kieron P O'Connor; Emmanuel Stip; Marc E Lavoie
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2009-04-24       Impact factor: 3.222

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.