Literature DB >> 12462741

The effects of stereo shift angle, geometric magnification and display zoom on depth measurements in digital stereomammography.

Mitchell M Goodsitt1, Heang-Ping Chan, Katie L Darner, Lubomir M Hadjiiski.   

Abstract

We are developing virtual three-dimensional (3-D) cursors for measuring depths in digital stereomammograms. We performed a study to investigate the effects of stereo shift angle, geometric magnification, and display zoom on the accuracy of depth measurements made with a virtual 3-D cursor. A phantom containing 50 low contrast fibrils at depths ranging from 1 to 11 mm was imaged with a full-field digital mammography system. Left- and right-eye images were generated at stereo shift angles of +/-3 degrees and +/-6 degrees, using either contact or 1.8x geometric magnification geometry. The images were viewed on a high-resolution stereoscopic display system in normal and 2x zoom mode. Observers viewed the images with stereo glasses and adjusted the depth of a cross-shaped virtual cursor to best match the perceived depth of each fibril. The results for two trained observers with excellent stereo acuity were nearly identical when viewing the same images. The average root mean square errors for the two observers were 1.2 mm (+/-3 degrees contact, no zoom), 1.3 mm (+/-3 degrees contact zoom), 0.8 mm (+/-6 degrees contact, no zoom), 0.6 mm (+/-6 degrees contact, zoom), 0.8 mm (+/-3 magnification, no zoom), 0.7 mm (+/-3 degrees magnification, zoom), and 0.2 mm (+/-6 degrees magnification, no zoom). One observer repeated the entire study for two additional fibril phantom configurations. Combining all the results, we found that for the contact geometry increasing the stereo shift angle from +/-3 degrees to +/-6 degrees improved the depth measurement accuracy by factors of about 1.2-4.0. Zooming did not provide observable improvement in the depth measurement accuracy; sometimes having no effect, sometimes improving the accuracy, and other times reducing the accuracy, with no general trends. Its effect is likely within experimental errors. However, the stereo effect was more readily visualized in the zoom mode. Geometric magnification improved the depth measurement accuracy. The best accuracy among all cases was about 0.2 mm, obtained with geometric magnification using a stereo angle of +/-6 degrees. This is the mode we recommend for obtaining accurate depth measurements with virtual cursors in stereomammograms.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12462741     DOI: 10.1118/1.1517615

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  3 in total

1.  Compare display schemes for lung nodule CT screening.

Authors:  Xiao Hui Wang; Janet E Durick; Amy Lu; David L Herbert; Carl R Fuhrman; Joan M Lacomis; Cynthia A Britton; Diane C Strollo; Sherry S Shang; Saraswathi K Golla; Walter F Good
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Computer-aided detection system for breast masses on digital tomosynthesis mammograms: preliminary experience.

Authors:  Heang-Ping Chan; Jun Wei; Berkman Sahiner; Elizabeth A Rafferty; Tao Wu; Marilyn A Roubidoux; Richard H Moore; Daniel B Kopans; Lubomir M Hadjiiski; Mark A Helvie
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-10-19       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 3.  Breast cancer imaging: a perspective for the next decade.

Authors:  Andrew Karellas; Srinivasan Vedantham
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.071

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.