Literature DB >> 12462428

In vitro activity of ertapenem against common clinical isolates in relation to human pharmacokinetics.

I Friedland1, L A Mixson, A Majumdar, M Motyl, G L Woods.   

Abstract

The in vitro activity of ertapenem against bacterial pathogens isolated from patients with moderate to severe complicated intra-abdominal, complicated skin/skin structure, acute pelvic, or complicated urinary tract infection or community acquired pneumonia was compared to ceftriaxone and piperacillin-tazobactam and related to known plasma concentrations of the three agents. Ertapenem was more potent against methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) than ceftriaxone and piperacillin-tazobactam and was more potent and more active than both of these agents against Enterobacteriaceae and anaerobes. Piperacillin-tazobactam was the most active agent against enterococci and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. All isolates of Enterobacteriaceae (n=1088), Streptococcus pyogenes (n=37), Streptococcus agalactiae (n=48), MSSA (n=187), Haemophilus influenzae (n=59), and Moraxella catarrhalis (n=9) were susceptible to ertapenem; < 1% of 1284 anaerobes and only 1 of 113 Streptococcus pneumoniae (a penicillin-resistant isolate) were resistant to ertapenem. The MIC value at which 90% of all Enterobacteriaceae, streptococci, MSSA, H. influenzae, M. catarrhalis, and anaerobes were inhibited (MIC90) was < or = 1 microg/ml and below the mean plasma concentration of total ertapenem following a 1 g intravenous infusion for at least 24 hours, i.e., the entire recommended dosing interval, and below the free drug concentration for at least 8 h.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12462428     DOI: 10.1179/joc.2002.14.5.483

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chemother        ISSN: 1120-009X            Impact factor:   1.714


  5 in total

1.  Design, synthesis, and evaluation of prodrugs of ertapenem.

Authors:  Sheo B Singh; Diane Rindgen; Prudence Bradley; Lovji Cama; Wanying Sun; Michael J Hafey; Takao Suzuki; Nengxue Wang; Hao Wu; Basheng Zhang; Li Wang; Chongmin Ji; Hongshi Yu; Richard Soll; David B Olsen; Peter T Meinke; Deborah A Nicoll-Griffith
Journal:  ACS Med Chem Lett       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 4.345

Review 2.  Ertapenem: a review of its use in the treatment of bacterial infections.

Authors:  Gillian M Keating; Caroline M Perry
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 3.  Comparative review of the carbapenems.

Authors:  George G Zhanel; Ryan Wiebe; Leanne Dilay; Kristjan Thomson; Ethan Rubinstein; Daryl J Hoban; Ayman M Noreddin; James A Karlowsky
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 4.  Ertapenem: a review of its use in the management of bacterial infections.

Authors:  Monique Curran; Dene Simpson; Caroline Perry
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  Pharmacokinetics of total and unbound ertapenem in healthy elderly subjects.

Authors:  D G Musson; A Majumdar; S Holland; K Birk; L Xi; G Mistry; D Sciberras; J Muckow; P Deutsch; J D Rogers
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 5.191

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.