Literature DB >> 12461369

Uncemented acetabular components for arthritis after acetabular fracture.

Daniel J Berry1, Michael Halasy.   

Abstract

The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the results of uncemented acetabular components used to treat posttraumatic arthritis after acetabular fracture at a minimum of 10 years. Thirty-four hips in 33 patients (mean age, 49.7 years, range, 19-78 years) were treated from 1984 to 1990 at one institution with a total hip arthroplasty using an uncemented titanium porous-coated socket. Four patients died before 10 years (all with implants intact). Nine patients had the acetabulum revised: four had the shell and liner revised (one for loosening, one for loosening and dislocation, and two for osteolysis) and five had the liner alone revised (three for polyethylene wear and two for dislocation). All patients with unrevised hip replacements who were alive and patients who were not lost to followup had no or minimal pain at final followup (range, 10-16 years); no components were radiographically loose. Uncemented sockets had a low rate of loosening in this challenging patient population, but polyethylene wear and osteolysis were problematic.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12461369     DOI: 10.1097/00003086-200212000-00020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  16 in total

Review 1.  Management of neglected acetabular fractures.

Authors:  L A Veerappa; S K Tripathy; R K Sen
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 3.693

Review 2.  [Hip endoprosthetics in osteoarthritis after acetabular fractures].

Authors:  W Schneiders; A Hartmann; T Meyner; K-P Günther
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  THA after acetabular fracture fixation: is frozen section necessary?

Authors:  Robert S Sterling; Erik M Krushinski; Vincent D Pellegrini
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  [Total hip replacement for coxarthrosis following acetabular fracture. Significance of age and injury severity].

Authors:  C Frank; P Siozos; A Wentzensen; D Schulte-Bockholt; P A Grützner; T Gühring
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.000

5.  WHICH PROBLEMATICS IN THA AFTER ACETABULAR FRACTURES: EXPERIENCE OF 38 CASES.

Authors:  Fabio Zanchini; Antonio Piscopo; Luigi Aurelio Nasto; Davide Piscopo; Alessia Boemio; Stefano Cacciapuoti; Giuseppe Iodice; Valerio Cipolloni; Federico Fusini
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2022-10-13

6.  Impaction bone grafting and a cemented cup after acetabular fracture.

Authors:  Eelco Bronsema; Martijn A J te Stroet; Maartje Zengerink; Albert van Kampen; B Willem Schreurs
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 7.  Total hip arthroplasty in acetabular fractures.

Authors:  Deepak Gautam; Saurabh Gupta; Rajesh Malhotra
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2020-10-17

8.  Total Hip Arthroplasty After Acetabular Fracture Is Associated With Lower Survivorship and More Complications.

Authors:  Zachary Morison; Dirk Jan F Moojen; Aaron Nauth; Jeremy Hall; Michael D McKee; James P Waddell; Emil H Schemitsch
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Porous metal acetabular components have a low rate of mechanical failure in THA after operatively treated acetabular fracture.

Authors:  Brandon J Yuan; David G Lewallen; Arlen D Hanssen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Alumina-on-alumina hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 30 years old.

Authors:  R Nizard; D Pourreyron; A Raould; D Hannouche; L Sedel
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.