Literature DB >> 20945123

THA after acetabular fracture fixation: is frozen section necessary?

Robert S Sterling1, Erik M Krushinski, Vincent D Pellegrini.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Infection is uncommon after THA performed for failed acetabular fracture repair, despite a high reported incidence of culture-positive fixation implants. The use of frozen section analysis at the time of THA after acetabular fracture fixation surgery is unknown. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We asked whether frozen section analysis predicted occult infection after THA performed after acetabular fracture repair.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 43 of 49 patients with prior acetabular fracture fixation who had intraoperative frozen section and culture data from a conversion THA between 2002 and 2010. The average age of patients at fracture was 53 years; conversion was performed after an average of 553 days (median, 369 days; range, 51-2951 days). Five patients had an infection after acetabular fracture surgery (three deep, two superficial). At conversion we obtained an average of three frozen section specimens per patient; 10 specimens in eight patients contained greater than 10 polymorphonuclear cells/high-power field. The minimum followup was 51 days (median, 256 days; range, 51-2085 days).
RESULTS: Five patients had positive intraoperative cultures, three of whom had a positive frozen section. All patients who had prior deep infection developed positive intraoperative cultures. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of frozen section analysis were 0.60, 0.87, 0.38, and 0.94, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Infection complicating THA after acetabular fracture repair is uncommon. A history of deep infection complicating the acetabular fracture surgery was the strongest predictor of infection. Frozen section analysis has a high specificity and negative predictive value. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, diagnostic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 20945123      PMCID: PMC3018212          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-010-1612-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  21 in total

1.  Infection of the surgical site after arthroplasty of the hip.

Authors:  S Ridgeway; J Wilson; A Charlet; G Kafatos; A Pearson; R Coello
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2005-06

2.  The significance of positive cultures from orthopedic fixation devices in the absence of clinical infection.

Authors:  F W Moussa; J O Anglen; J C Gehrke; G Christensen; W A Simpson
Journal:  Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ)       Date:  1997-09

Review 3.  Total hip replacement after acetabular fracture.

Authors:  M L Jimenez; M Tile; R S Schenk
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 2.472

4.  Usefulness of histological analysis for predicting the presence of microorganisms at the time of reimplantation after hip resection arthroplasty for the treatment of infection.

Authors:  Guillem Bori; Alex Soriano; Sebastián García; Carme Mallofré; Josep Riba; Josep Mensa
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  Frozen section biopsy assessment for the presence of polymorphonuclear leukocytes in patients undergoing revision of arthroplasties.

Authors:  F W Abdul-Karim; M G McGinnis; M Kraay; S N Emancipator; V Goldberg
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 7.842

6.  Diagnosis of infection by frozen section during revision arthroplasty.

Authors:  N A Athanasou; R Pandey; R de Steiger; D Crook; P M Smith
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1995-01

7.  Prospective analysis of preoperative and intraoperative investigations for the diagnosis of infection at the sites of two hundred and two revision total hip arthroplasties.

Authors:  M J Spangehl; B A Masri; J X O'Connell; C P Duncan
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Analysis of frozen sections of intraoperative specimens obtained at the time of reoperation after hip or knee resection arthroplasty for the treatment of infection.

Authors:  C J Della Valle; E Bogner; P Desai; J H Lonner; E Adler; J D Zuckerman; P E Di Cesare
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  The role of intraoperative frozen sections in revision total joint arthroplasty.

Authors:  D S Feldman; J H Lonner; P Desai; J D Zuckerman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Total hip arthroplasty after operative treatment of an acetabular fracture.

Authors:  M Weber; D J Berry; W S Harmsen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  1 in total

1.  Porous metal acetabular components have a low rate of mechanical failure in THA after operatively treated acetabular fracture.

Authors:  Brandon J Yuan; David G Lewallen; Arlen D Hanssen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.176

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.